Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color are school buses in the United States?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by star2be00
 - Jul 27, 2002, 06:32 PM
Polycop,

     I would really like to talk to you in relation to the pre-hiring process that the polygraph is involved in...e-mail me if you accept, my user name is the same and the domain is at yahoo.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 26, 2002, 04:10 PM
The Guilty Knowledge Test described by David T. Lykken in A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector at least has a plausible theoretical basis, and it might be possible to make logical inferences about a person's knowledge of a crime based on test results. Nonetheless, it appears to be vulnerable to countermeasures, and further research is needed. I can't say I endorse it at this time.
Posted by Polycop
 - Jun 26, 2002, 03:12 PM
Hi Anti-Poly Guys...

I have a question:

Since I have been reading this site, I have learned of your opinions regarding Probable Lie Testing, Directed Lie Testing, and R&I Testing.  My question is:

Is there any polygraph procedure that you believe to be based in scientific methods and you would endorse?

Since this site is called "antipolygraph.org, I guess I have asked a stupid question.  I just wanted to know... ???

Polycop...