Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by stefano
 - Feb 27, 2012, 12:53 AM
RealEyes, "succesive hurdles" does not refer to a type of polygraph exam. It refers to "breaking out" suspected issues from a multiple issue exam and dealing with them in a single issue format. Any thread of accuracy polygraphy claims, is based upon testing of a single issue--as in "did you do this?" Not, "did you did this, that and the other?"
Posted by RealEyes
 - Feb 27, 2012, 12:44 AM
While reading, I found a type of test that I can't find in TLBTLD. It sounds like a variation of the Relevant/Irrelevant test, but it's always referred to as the "successive hurdles" technique.

What is it?

What is the difference between a single-issue and multiple-issue test?

How would countermeasures be applied in this test?