Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the last letter of the word, "America.":
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by TS Elliot
 - Jul 12, 2009, 10:01 AM
See there you go again. You are looking for Van Arsdale so you find him. At least in your own mind.
Posted by T.M. Cullen
 - Jul 11, 2009, 06:52 PM
For the record, I was the one who exposed Mr. Coffey (forgot his first name), polygrapher extraordinaire.  He used to post here as TheNoLieGuy4You.  He was the one who accused GM of spying for Iran, with absolutely no evidence.  Talk about smear.

I also was the one who identified "Anonymous too", and "Ed Earl" as being the same guy who posted here for years as "Sancho Panza".  GM later exposed him as Ed "E.B." Van Arsdale, in Ponza City Ok.

Guess these guys just can't take their own medicine.  :'(

TC

P.S.  T.S. Elliot is likely Van Arsdale, but who cares?

P.P.S.  For anyone so inclined, feel free to expose me.  I  really don't care.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jul 11, 2009, 06:30 PM
Drz,

Unless you've come here to troll these forums, you have nothing to fear.
Posted by Drz
 - Jul 11, 2009, 06:23 PM
Thanks but I regret even asking.  I didn't know you posted personal stuff about your users on this site.  I feel kind of suckered in. 


You don't seem too ethical after all and you apparently keep track of your users to embarrass them later when you feel the need.  I hope this isn't the case but how do I know you're not going to post my information if I ever have a polygraph test coming up?


 
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jul 06, 2009, 05:46 AM
It depends on the employer. Agencies that require employees and/or applicants to submit to polygraph screening typically do not exempt their polygraph operators from this requirement. But not all polygraph examinations are created equally. Polygraphers failing polygraph screening examinations is virtually unheard of. I am aware of only one case wherein a polygraph operator failed an employment-related polygraph examination. (The polygraph examiner in question had fallen out of political favor with the CIA's Polygraph Division.) On the whole, polygraphers polygraphing polygraphers seems to be an act of mutual masturbation.
Posted by Drz
 - Jul 05, 2009, 04:05 PM
Do polygraph examiners have to take a polygraph themselves for employment?  It would only seem fair that if they believe in the procedure and validity of the exam that they would need to pass one themselves.