Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by T.M. Cullen
 - Feb 02, 2009, 01:33 PM
http://www.polygraphplace.com/spotlight/danmangan.htm

I guess "False Positives" are not as "rare" as polygraphers posting on this board have claimed.  At least there must be enough to warrant the above advertisement targeted toward industry operators.

Of course,  they attribute the ever dreaded false positive to choosing poor operators who use improper technique, rather than the polygraph itself.  A common trend.  

The ad even favorably mentions the NAS report, which polygraphers have frequently criticized.

TC