Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by exssg
 - Dec 19, 2006, 06:54 PM
Kudos..... FBI bunglers is right. What a bunch of asswipes...................
Posted by nolehce
 - Apr 15, 2005, 03:42 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7505601/

Yes, those same FBidiots who failed you on your polygraph exam also failed one of their informants in the Terry Nichols / Oklahoma City bombing case, despite the fact that he just happened to be telling the truth.

Relying on the polygraph, the Federal Bunglers of Investigations disbelieved the informant when he told them explosives remained in Nichols' home some ten whole years after the bombing. Idiots. Idiots. Idiots.

Apparently the Fboobs didn't look hard enough a decade ago because when they returned to the house -- BINGO -- they found the explosives. Give the next dumbass G-man you encounter the bird and a friendly grin.  :P