Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by winchester
 - Oct 21, 2006, 08:59 PM
anyone have any idea if what she did was legit or a setup?

Posted by winchester
 - Sep 30, 2006, 09:50 PM
Here is my background situation, admitted to the polygrapher that I had some basic knowledge of the poly when I went in for the last phase of the hiring process for a large sheriff department.

He immediately went on the defensive...

Anyways my BI instructed me to ask him if I passed or not and then contact her with the results?

me being the trusting honest person I am did just that, I fear that this made me look guilty as sin

Is this standard procedure or was I setup for failure, through some research it seems like they never give you the results right after the poly?

I was interrogated for about 20 mins after the poly and was told I was lying even when I wasn't.

I really wish I had read up before I took this test