Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color are the stars on the U.S. flag?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by cesium_133
 - Jun 19, 2006, 01:52 AM
 :) Taken 3 polys in my life, and the stim was only used in the first one, which was R/I.  Both CQT's had no stim test... no numbers, no trick deck of cards, no battery of irrelevants at the beginning.  Nothing...

As a 4-time end-to-end reader of TLBTLD (bless you, George...), and from my own experiences, I can tell you this with some surety:

Polygraphers can be pains in the rump or very sweet to you.  Depending on what whoever hired them wants to hear, whether they want to pass or fail you or don't care, and what their quota is for confessions, who knows how they'll go about things- especially on something that even they know is a fraud (stim tests are deceit defined)...
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Apr 30, 2006, 08:46 AM
No, it's not always administered (although it usually is). In some cases, for example when an examinee is brought back for a follow-up polygraph, the stim test might be skipped.
Posted by polywantahcracker
 - Apr 26, 2006, 07:43 PM
in federal Polygraphs?  Or is it up to the personal preference of the polygrapher?

poly