Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Mr. Mystery
 - May 20, 2006, 02:07 AM
Ray,

1.  By all accounts Waco has been polygraph happy for a long time.  They even polygraph their firefighters.

2.  I suppose it is possible that he just woke up one morning and decided to become a pedophile.  I guess we'll never know.
Posted by Ray
 - May 19, 2006, 08:59 PM
Mr. Mystery - Explain to me how polygraph missed this guy.  

A couple of points to consider before you answer that:  1. Are you sure that he was polygraphed (hired 20 years ago)?
2. Do have any facts to indicate that he was involved in child pornography prior to 1986?
Posted by Mr. Mystery
 - May 19, 2006, 07:23 PM
Waco, TX police officer pleads guilty to possessing child pornography:

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/content/news/stories/2006/05/19/05192006wacporncop.html

It appears that the city of Waco does indeed use the good ol' CQT screening polygraph (right hand side of page under "Applicant Processing Procedure"):

http://www.waco-texas.com/city_depts/police/policejobs.htm#salary