Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Jitters
 - Mar 01, 2004, 06:42 PM
First of all let me say outside of being a nervous wreck it was an otherwise pleasant experience. The polygrapher was a geniunely nice individual and thoroughly explained everything that was going to happen without putting any spin on it like I thought he would.
We went through a set of questions two times. There seemed to be zero control or irrelevant questions, I identified all questions as relevant which surprised me. I was so nervous the first half of both sessions I was surprised I passed at all, if I did. That brings me to my question.
After it was all over he basically said, "you're done", Ill pass all this along and someone shoudl be calling you. He then took me to do some other post test stuff which I will not explain in detail but it was laid out in the appointment as part of the applicant phase.
So:
A) There was no post test interview, but no mention of passing as well what can I take from this?

B) If I did "fail", would he have still taken me to do the other things that he did which were part of the plan for this portion of the hiring process?

What do you think?

BTW, no countermeasures were used, would not know where to use them in this kind of test.