Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the third word in this sentence: 'The quick brown fox jumps.' (answer in lowercase):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Feb 26, 2004, 10:05 AM
Now that the examiner's manual for DoDPI's Law Enforcement Pre-Employment Test is in the public domain, I suspect that cosmetic changes such as you have suggested will indeed be made. But no amount of tinkering by the flying monkeys at DoDPI will be enough to restore the mystique of the polygraph for those who have seen the little man behind the polygraph curtain.

;)
Posted by Anonymous
 - Feb 24, 2004, 10:58 AM
Can you imagine the conversation at Oz (DoDPI) this morning....  

One instructor says to another, "Antipolygraph.org is on to us introducting comparison (control) questions as honesty and integrity questions (http://antipolygraph.org/documents/dodpi-lepet.pdf, Apendix A, paragraph 6.5) ...duh...what do we call em now?"   ;D