Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Canadian Crusader
 - Feb 03, 2004, 07:43 PM
To begin with I don't think there is any validity regarding the poly nor has any study been done to test the poly to that effect.  Correct me if I am wrong.

Second I believe the infrared method or pupil dilation (different lie detection techniques) is no different than a poly.  They all work under the assumption that spiked autonomous nervous system reactions, flushed face, or dilated pupils are indicators of deception.  I think they are all garbage.  IMHO.
Posted by wscook
 - Feb 03, 2004, 12:10 PM
Has anyone compared the validity of the results of a poly vs the results of infrared?