Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last name of the first U.S. president?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by gdog
 - Feb 02, 2004, 12:59 AM
Anyone know for sure if they use detection devices?  My friend who took their test said they had a pad in the chair!  
Posted by burnett
 - Feb 01, 2004, 07:28 PM
my brother took their test a couple months ago and said it was a long test but not as bad as he thought it would be. he passed and is going to school in the spring.  
Posted by mjcek2
 - Jan 31, 2004, 06:37 PM
I took the poly for uniform division back in the fall of 2002....worst experience ever...it felt like i was being seen as dishonest even before we started....then afterwards he sat there for 45 mins telling me that im "99% there" and that I just need to admit to what i was being deceptive about (even though i was 100% truthful)....I highly suggest that someone thinks twice before applying to the USSS...even if you have nothing to hide...
Posted by jackson
 - Jan 31, 2004, 03:30 AM
Many applicants have had a negative experience with this agencys exam, They seem to be more interogating during the polygraph than other agencies. I was curious if the secret service has a very high polygraph disqualification rate for uniformed division officer candidates. Maybe their is someone who took the agencys polygraph is reading this.