This letter was sent to Mr. Leslie R. Blake, head of the Defense Security Service Office of Freedom of Information and Privacy, by e-mail to <leslie.blake@mail.dss.mil> on 5 September 2001. On 9 November 2001, DSS replied, withholding all requested materials. For discussion of this FOIA request, see the message board thread, DSS Withholds R/I Screening Documentation.
AntiPolygraph.org
Hart Nibbrigkade 22
2597 XV Den Haag
Netherlands
maschke@antipolygraph.org
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE
OFFICE OF FOI AND PRIVACY
ATTN: MR. LESLIE R. BLAKE
1340 BRADDOCK PLACE
ALEXANDRIA VA 22314-1651
Dear Mr. Blake:
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552).
I request that copies of the following documentation be provided
to me:
All Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DoDPI)
materials describing the R/I (Relevant/Irrelevant) Screening
Test, whether on paper, videotape, computer media, or in any
other format.
The material covered by this request includes, but is not limited
to, the course materials used in the DoDPI course, "Screening
R&I," which is described on the DoDPI website
(http://www.dodpi.army.mil/instruction/coned.htm#c21):
SCREENING R&I (40 CEH)
This course is intended to augment existing screening test
protocols employed by the various federal agencies. Students
will be provided instruction in the employment of the R/I
Screening Test in support of initial pre-employment and
periodic counterintelligence testing. In addition, students
will learn to use the R/I Techniques in extended series
testing, employing breakdown and clearing chart examinations.
Instruction in the utilization of global analysis for
conducting test data analysis will be provided. Students
should expect intra-course assessments of their mastery of
the methodologies presented in this course. The first four
days of training will require, on average, one hour of
evening study supporting a case study exercise. This course
requires laboratory work and it is recommended that students
provide their own polygraph instrument.
Prerequisite: Students must be active, federally certified or
contracted PDD examiners or; an examiner employed by a state,
county, or local law enforcement or corrections agency who
has graduated from a PDD course at a school accredited by the
American Polygraph Association.
Because no security clearance is required for this course, and
because it is open to non-federal employees (and even to
contractors), I see no legitimate reason for the Defense Security
Service to shield these course materials from public scrutiny.
The material covered by this request also includes any DoDPI
research materials related to the R/I Screening Test. I was
surprised to see that a Relevant/Irrelevant screening technique is
still on the DoDPI curriculum, because the technique is widely
discredited, even in the polygraph community.
On 25 January 2001, Dr. Andrew Ryan, chief of the DoDPI Research
Division, speaking at the first public meeting of the National
Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Study to Review the
Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, stated:
The curriculum at DoDPI, the lesson plans as they are being
reviewed by the Middle States and others for the
accreditation process, it's -- they're finding out that the
curriculum there is based on research.... The curriculum
changes that occur there, when we -- when and if we modify
the curriculum, the training that the examiners receive, it
must be backed up by research findings. So, unlike the early
days in the 1950s when the school was located at Fort Jackson
[sic] and I guess we would have to say the school, the
training, was basically governed and controlled by the
folklore of the polygraph industry, and now it's driven by
research...
Dr. Ryan's remarks are available on the National Academy of
Sciences website in RealPlayer format at:
http://video.nationalacademies.org/ramgen/dbasse/012601_3.rm
(The above-cited passage begins about 16 minutes and 30 seconds
into the recording.)
If the DoDPI R/I Screening Test is indeed based on research, then
it is most certainly in the public interest that this research be
publicly released, so that the public may have some assurance that
the R/I Screening Test (which is apparently used in making
decisions about the suitability of members of the public for
government employment and/or access to classified information) is
not "governed and controlled by the folklore of the polygraph
industry."
In order to help you determine my status for the purpose of
assessing fees, you should know that this request is made for
public awareness purposes and not for commercial use.
AntiPolygraph.org is a grassroots organization of freely
associating individuals and is not a profit-seeking enterprise.
I am willing to pay fees for this request up to a maximum of $25.
If you estimate that the fees will exceed this limit, please
inform me first.
I request, however, a waiver of fees for this request because
disclosure of the requested information to me is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of the operations and activities of the
Department of Defense and is not in my commercial interest.
Sincerely,
George W. Maschke
AntiPolygraph.org
PS: A copy of this Freedom of Information Act request will be
placed on-line at:
http://antipolygraph.org/foia/foia-007.shtml