Lets' keep the comments on this board professional.  The purpose of AP is to post information of value.  There are always going to be controversial companies in any marketplace.   

For example we have had some good articles and comments the past few days on espionage, which is far more interesting than this post.

       Clearly, you seem be connected to Nitv to downplay the enormous importance of a scam of a fake lie detector ruining millions of criminal cases and falsely accusing millions of innocent people. Others in the past, connected to nitv, have posted on AP using fake names that were later "outed" by Mr. Maschke. They wrote false  information about other lie detector businesses to take sales away from them for Nitv. One of those "unmasked" was Tom Golden, a former high level military person who was "outed" in the 2006 lawsuit by Nitv against Vipre. It was revealed in that lawsuit Golden did many types of "dirty tricks" for Nitv.
        As per your remark to keep the comments "professional", FACTS are professional. Every scam is important, especially the scam of a fake lie detector being sold to various law enforcement departments nationwide for 30 years, including to the US military which banned the Cvsa after a few years of use and having wasted about $1 million buying Nitv's Cvsa's and  made up training. The nitv scam has been extremely documented, in detail, by many news sites, lawsuits, AP and other sites for 30 years. A scam that is still going on today. A scam that bought full page ads then double full page ads every month for 15 years in major police magazines to lie about their gadget, training, owner, accuracy and credibility only to get pigeons to make money, estimated to be about $75 million so far. A scam that had to use made up "studies" (DoD, Chapman) to make people think their gadget works. A scam that used made up claims of "not affected by drugs, alcohol or counter-measures" in their ads. Claims that nitv has never documented, in any way, as being factual. Nitv's lack of proof also applies to their training course and their made up AIS body language course that Nitv claims is also a lie detector.   
       Mr. Todd B, would you be so indifferent on this matter if it was you being accused of a crime because you flunked a test by a extremely unreliable "voice lie detector" with NO independent studies that proved the accuracy was better than a coin toss? If this topic bores you, don't bother reading my posts. I am trying to protect people and law enforcement.

Page 56 shows a breakdown of why the study is flawed.