Normal Topic DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants" (Read 1250 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Online


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 5827
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"
Aug 12th, 2017 at 9:15am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
A report by the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security, finds that U.S. Customs and Border Protection wasted millions of dollars administering polygraph examinations to unsuitable applicants. The 17-page report may be downloaded here:

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2017/OIG-17-99-MA-080417.pdf

Much of the alleged waste stems from polygraph examinations administered to applicants who made disqualifying admissions during the pre-test phase of their polygraph examinations.

I have a question for polygraph examiners, especially those who work for or who have contracted with federal agencies: if an examinee makes a disqualifying pre-test admission, should the polygraph examiner be paid less for that polygraph examination?

I don't think so. If this becomes the policy, then it will predictably create an incentive for polygraph examiners, especially non-salaried contractors, to discourage pre-test admissions. Am I wrong?
« Last Edit: Aug 12th, 2017 at 3:16pm by George W. Maschke »  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
PGP Public Key: 316A947C
PGP Public Key (offline): 2BF4374B
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Doug Williams
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 255
Joined: Feb 15th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"
Reply #1 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:29pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George W. Maschke wrote on Aug 12th, 2017 at 9:15am:
A report by the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security, finds that U.S. Customs and Border Protection wasted millions of dollars administering polygraph examinations to unsuitable applicants. The 17-page report may be downloaded here:

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2017/OIG-17-99-MA-080417.pdf

Much of the alleged waste stems from polygraph examinations administered to applicants who made disqualifying admissions during the pre-test phase of their polygraph examinations.

I have a question for polygraph examiners, especially those who work for or who have contracted with federal agencies: if an examinee makes a disqualifying pre-test admission, should the polygraph examiner be paid less for that polygraph examination?

I don't think so. If this becomes the policy, then it will predictably create an incentive for polygraph examiners, especially non-salaried contractors, to discourage pre-test admissions. Am I wrong?


This report by the office of Inspector General is good as far as it goes but why don't they address the very important issue of how utterly absurd it is to continue to use the polygraph when it is been proven to be no more accurate than the toss of the coin?
  

It is time to put a stop to this government sponsored sadism perpetrated by those who use this insidious Orwellian instrument of torture called the 'lie detector'! Education is the most effective weapon I have to finally put a stop to the abusive practice of polygraph 'testing'. Help me by educating yourself and others. My book FROM COP TO CRUSADER: THE STORY OF MY FIGHT AGAINST THE DANGROUS MYTH OF "LIE DETECTION" is available on Amazon in e-book or paperback - please get this book and send it to as many people as you can - it literally destroys the myth of "lie detection"! Doug Williams
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"
Reply #2 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:38pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
There's your self-licking ice cream cone.  A self-perpetuating system that has no purpose other than to sustain itself.

As the covers are pulled back, we begin to see the Polygraph Industry for what it really is.

A total sham.

It is however, good to see that the DHS has an OIG that is capable of doing a proper investigation.  The DOD definitely doesn't.

  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation. No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results." ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Wandersmann
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 228
Joined: Jun 2nd, 2015
Re: DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"
Reply #3 - Aug 14th, 2017 at 3:26am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
John M. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:38pm:
It is however, good to see that the DHS has an OIG that is capable of doing a proper investigation. The DOD definitely doesn't.


Typical REMF run operation. Grin   Speaking of REMF's, where ya been Quickfix ?  I'm still looking forward to buying you a Heineken.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"
Reply #4 - Aug 14th, 2017 at 8:25pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Doug Williams wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
This report by the office of Inspector General is good as far as it goes

In my case, I talked directly to the DOD IG Congressional Liaison, Mr. Steven M. Anthony.  After hearing me out, he acknowledged that they didn't do a proper investigation. He declined to ask them to reopen it, because in his words, "there wasn't much the IG could do anyway, except maybe embarrass them".  "Them" being the DIA Office of Security.

Wasn't HR 6450 - "The Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016" supposed to give them more power?



  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation. No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results." ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
DHS OIG Says "CBP Spent Millions Conducting Polygraph Examinations on Unsuitable Applicants"

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X