Normal Topic What should a person do? (Read 2676 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box mikerq
Guest


What should a person do?
Aug 9th, 2008 at 7:12pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
According to this article, http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-08-01-fbi_N.htm, the FBI and Police 'loosened' their policy with respect to marijuana use.

Bearing this in mind, if a person used marijuana 2 or 3 times when they were young, should they confess in the sf86 and polygraph or not?  Many posters say 'don't confess', but this article states if it is experimental it will be forgiven.  Is it a lie to get people to confess?

By the way, if the point of a polygraph if for a person to confess, no one will will pass any polygraph test and noone will be hired in any agency.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box mikerq
Guest


Re: What should a person do?
Reply #1 - Aug 11th, 2008 at 11:15pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Hi if someone could answer the question in the first message, it would be very helpful although I know you are all busy spreading helpful knowledge with other messages.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Sergeant1107
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 730
Location: Connecticut, USA
Joined: May 21st, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: What should a person do?
Reply #2 - Aug 12th, 2008 at 8:28am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
When you apply answer all questions truthfully.  If your past behavior disqualifies you then choose a different career.  If the polygraph examiner incorrectly concludes you are lying then apply at another agency and tell the truth on that application as well.
  

Lorsque vous utilisez un argumentum ad hominem, tout le monde sait que vous êtes intellectuellement faillite.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Lethe
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 233
Joined: Apr 15th, 2007
Re: What should a person do?
Reply #3 - Aug 13th, 2008 at 11:08pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Sergeant1107 wrote on Aug 12th, 2008 at 8:28am:
When you apply answer all questions truthfully.  If your past behavior disqualifies you then choose a different career.  If the polygraph examiner incorrectly concludes you are lying then apply at another agency and tell the truth on that application as well.


I agree with the content of the quoted post.
  

Is former APA President Skip Webb evil or just stupid?

Is former APA President Ed Gelb an idiot or does the polygraph just not work?

Did you know that polygrapher Sackett doesn't care about detecting deception to relevant questions?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box NJBeachGuy
Guest


Re: What should a person do?
Reply #4 - Aug 14th, 2008 at 1:31pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
[font=Arial][/font]I sort of found this site by accident and have so far enjoyed its points of view. In response to this thread I can only offer my experiences with the exam and its results. Keep in mind my exams took place in the mid 80's where the atmosphere for "pot use" was not as relaxed as it is today.

I was examined by the FBI for a top secret clearance to be allowed to be a uniformed ceremonial guard at the White House while in the military. I was 19 at the time and asked about marijuana use. I told them I had experimented with it a few times in the pre-interview and when asked while wired up about my use in a number form I responded yes until the number exceeded what I thought reasonable then responded no. I was a young man then, college drop out, at the end of my rope before the military....What do you think my use was?
I later went on to be within arms length of 3 sitting presidents including the current one. 

Later I was examined again by a police agency and in the pre-interview the guy had me admit to all sorts of juvenile crimes and marijuana use. Again the same questions were asked and I used the same responses. I recently retired from that department.

I do not fully discredit the polygraph nor do I fully support it as in my case it obviously didn't work. What I do know is that if you are comfortable with your answer in your mind as well as physically then your answers won't really reflect on the results. 

As a person who has served on many review boards I can say admitted "experimentation" with marijuana will not get you disqualified, deception about it will. Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box polytek
User
**
Offline



Posts: 28
Joined: Jul 30th, 2008
Re: What should a person do?
Reply #5 - Aug 18th, 2008 at 12:56pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
[font=Arial][/font]I sort of found this site by accident and have so far enjoyed its points of view. In response to this thread I can only offer my experiences with the exam and its results. Keep in mind my exams took place in the mid 80's where the atmosphere for "pot use" was not as relaxed as it is today.

I was examined by the FBI for a top secret clearance to be allowed to be a uniformed ceremonial guard at the White House while in the military. I was 19 at the time and asked about marijuana use. I told them I had experimented with it a few times in the pre-interview and when asked while wired up about my use in a number form I responded yes until the number exceeded what I thought reasonable then responded no. I was a young man then, college drop out, at the end of my rope before the military....What do you think my use was?
I later went on to be within arms length of 3 sitting presidents including the current one. 

Later I was examined again by a police agency and in the pre-interview the guy had me admit to all sorts of juvenile crimes and marijuana use. Again the same questions were asked and I used the same responses. I recently retired from that department.

I do not fully discredit the polygraph nor do I fully support it as in my case it obviously didn't work. What I do know is that if you are comfortable with your answer in your mind as well as physically then your answers won't really reflect on the results. 

As a person who has served on many review boards I can say admitted "experimentation" with marijuana will not get you disqualified, deception about it will. Cool


And now you work for the APA as a lobbyist.
have fun with it.......................
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Lethe
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 233
Joined: Apr 15th, 2007
Re: What should a person do?
Reply #6 - Aug 19th, 2008 at 1:27pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
polytek wrote on Aug 18th, 2008 at 12:56pm:
Quote:
[font=Arial][/font]I sort of found this site by accident and have so far enjoyed its points of view. In response to this thread I can only offer my experiences with the exam and its results. Keep in mind my exams took place in the mid 80's where the atmosphere for "pot use" was not as relaxed as it is today.

I was examined by the FBI for a top secret clearance to be allowed to be a uniformed ceremonial guard at the White House while in the military. I was 19 at the time and asked about marijuana use. I told them I had experimented with it a few times in the pre-interview and when asked while wired up about my use in a number form I responded yes until the number exceeded what I thought reasonable then responded no. I was a young man then, college drop out, at the end of my rope before the military....What do you think my use was?
I later went on to be within arms length of 3 sitting presidents including the current one. 

Later I was examined again by a police agency and in the pre-interview the guy had me admit to all sorts of juvenile crimes and marijuana use. Again the same questions were asked and I used the same responses. I recently retired from that department.

I do not fully discredit the polygraph nor do I fully support it as in my case it obviously didn't work. What I do know is that if you are comfortable with your answer in your mind as well as physically then your answers won't really reflect on the results. 

As a person who has served on many review boards I can say admitted "experimentation" with marijuana will not get you disqualified, deception about it will. Cool


And now you work for the APA as a lobbyist.
have fun with it.......................


I'd rather lobby for Satan than the APA.  Hell, I'd sooner talk up childhood leukemia than that hive of scum and villainy.
  

Is former APA President Skip Webb evil or just stupid?

Is former APA President Ed Gelb an idiot or does the polygraph just not work?

Did you know that polygrapher Sackett doesn't care about detecting deception to relevant questions?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
What should a person do?

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X