Quote:However, there is a difference between being honest and being a blabbermouth. They really don't want to hear all of your dirty laundry.
True, they probably don't want to hear "blabber"---but it is not for the applicant to decide what is relevant. Too often people minimize things that require greater attention for the benefit of potential employers as well as the applicant him or herself.
Quote:I mean really, in order to even pass the test you have to lie. They have to get you to lie about something and have you feel guilty about it to guage your lie reaction in the first place
This is completely wrong. The control question does not require that the examinee intentionally lie. Period. We do not "get a lie" as a necessary part of the CQT method. Many poly antagonists here with no polygraph procedural expertise will claim otherwise, but they are wrong----and will not likely admit to being wrong. Wrong Wrong Wrong.
Quote:My point is, going into the test planning to be completely honest may not be the best strategy.
Your anecdotal experience aside----and by the way, whether your portrayal of your examiners is precise or a mere hyper-feminine perception, your story sounds terrible. Assuming your experience happened as you told it, your examiners need to find work elsewhere----unless of course your potential job candidacy involved very hard core, very calloused skillset---in which case the process is what it is called "The Distress Interview"----a staged, and highly stressful interview specifically meant to test your negative emotional threshold. Such Distress Interviews (formerly mis-labeled as "stress interviews") are typical for astronauts, deep cover intel agents, secret service agents, and even some polygraph examiner jobs for intel (yep) and others.
Quote:For the most part LEOs are not very forthcoming with personal nformation and that is the most appropirate demeaner to have. Just don't lie about the important stuff.
I wont touch that one.