It seems that Dr. Rovner is so used to lying when conducting a polygraph exam that he is hardly aware of when he is doing it anymore.

Okay, I can't help myself.  I'm anal this way, and I've seen the error here before.  You don't use a professional and academic title together, so Dr. X, Ph.D. is wrong.  It's a red flag indicating, as best I can tell, one of three things: 1) the "doctor" has a fake degree, 2) he's an egomaniac, or 3) he made it through school by the skin of his teeth (as he's forgotten the most important course he took: English Composition).  Okay, I'm pushing it a little, but this is one of those things that drives me crazy.  I'm sorry for the rant.  I'm seeing this more and more, but it's still wrong.

By the way, I'm off topic here, but when the APA banned phony "degrees," there were eight people who could no longer boast such titles.  The polygraph community is trying to put an end to such claims, contrary to the claims made here so often.

Just to be clear (during my rant) Dr. Rovner's doctorate is very much real, but he's either "Lou Rovner, Ph.D." or "Dr. Lou Rovner."

As chaplain, it would be unethical for me to speak publicly on that topic one way or the other (because I'd either have to speak for the AAPP - with inside information - or I'd have to speak without sufficient information, either of which would be wrong).  Moreover, as chaplain, I try to be more of a "Switzerland."  If Lou did engage in unethical activity, I'd be on the "let's fix it, Lou" side of things, and a public chastising wouldn't help me there.  (Plus, and the big reason, I'd have to first watch the entire video to form an opinion, and I'm not up to that one right now.)

I will say there are a number of people who have reported receiving a virus (after registering and posting on this site) that have been traced back to the Netherlands, and it has become almost common knowledge in the polygraph community that such is a risk of visiting here.  Right or wrong, there are many who really believe you were behind those.  If Lou said he received a virus from you, that wouldn't surprise me, and I would believe he believed it.

I have received a couple strange emails since registering here? Coincidence?  I don't know.  No virus attempts yet, but I'll let you know.

Quote:


George, need I remind you that I attempted to extinguish the "whisper campaign" regarding malware by posting a very objective poll---which rather than being placed in the "discarded post" was actually deleted. Such a poll would have been healthy for both sides. Further, your denial of having sent malware either intentionally or not is simply either a lie, or a statement made in ignorance---as it is possible to be unaware of such bots as a host. I would suggest you repost my original poll---as I will vote that I have not recieved malware from this site. I have however recieved alot of malware on weather websites though (I now know they are infamous for such), and I don't need to prove such allegations to those carriers. 

My questions were not "innuendo laden" as some of the questions were provided to debunk or dissect such accusations as being unfounded---thus seperating known fact of malware infiltration with "unsubstantiated suspicions" of infection. Your statement of disbelief is heresay---as well as the rest---as you and I both know you probably didn't even read the poll---as you were not online when I posted it and it was deleted within minutes. If one wants to read the entirety of Paradiddle's posts, you will see that not all of my posts were patently obstructive and/ or aggressive. Paradiddle wrote the truth plain and simple---and sardonic remarks concerning the absolute folly and/or lunacy of posters does not constitute a lack of integrity. I  am all too happy to call a moron a moron and a bullshitter a bullshitter. Admit it, you are clearly still upset that I called your poetry sophomoric, and you have demonstrated to all the inability to laugh at yourself---and even your closest allies will acknowledge your apperent lack of humor-----making mere jokes into ridecule----two very seperate things. In retrospect, I should have refrained from feeling a sense of indignation over your support for the disengagement and manipulation of sexual predators in psychotherapeutic treatment---thus evoking a sense that such overt acts of social prescriptive endangerement deserves to be lampooned when such a person attempts the refined and sensetive art of poetry.

I am still no less angry at your clumsy activism. Stick to the truth and you will get your wishes. Keep up the Karl Rove tactics and you will have wasted your life, and you will find that others will swiftboat you instead of the other way around. Post the goddamn poll and stop lying---or admit that Gino or some other site administrator got scared and deleted it without measured thought. The poll was not a smear, and it was deleted withing 5-10 minutes of my posting it---and you were not even online at the time. I smell both fear and horseshit.

THE ETHICS AND GRIEVANCES OFFICER 

IS STILL SEARCHING

FOR

THE RULES....

Barry_C wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2007 at 11:02pm:


Ask the APA. Slupski tried and failed. Gordon allegedly filed a complaint - but it never came to me formally - only via the rumour mill.

Quote:

Do you think i give flying f** what you think ?
God forbid

Quote:


The APA told gordon HE (not me Noddy) would have to apply to SA courts if he desired any action against me. what you or APA or gordon "think" is of no consequence.

George - a bit sad that you admonish me to stop haranguing BC but yet you allow him to use this forum for personal mud slinging.

Enough is enough - over and out