Paradiddle wrote on Oct 6
th, 2007 at 3:51am:
I must ask. Lethe, why don't you just admit that you are George's alter-ego. Your posts are intentionally cold and inhuman, and George himself never seems to have comment---this being the only long-game thread he has not posted onto---and the diction and rythmic value of your "Lethe" literary style matches that of George's posts and also his sophomoric poetry.
Whether it is sophomoric or not I don't know, but I find George's playful verse to evince more talent than anything I could come up with. As for what you mean by my posts being "intentionally cold and inhuman" I don't know either. I don't see what would be added to my posts by imitating the insulting, juvenile style that other members of this forum take.
Now. Will you answer the actual questions about this thread? In this single thread alone you polygraphers have commented on or asked questions about my avatar, my screen name, my motivations, my background, why I want to know about the polygraph, my opinion of Drew Richardson, whether I interpret Genesis literally, what Richardson's qualifications are or aren't, whether gullible is in the dictionary or not, whether I am pailryder, whether I am George, and on the size of my erect thingy. In short, you have talked about just about everything except what I started this thread to talk about: whether or not and how the polygraph works on a perfectly knowledgeable subject who knows how it works and can identify the control questions. And, somehow, Ludovico has it in him to insinuate that I am the one who doesn't want to have a good faith discussion.
Now, let's set that all aside. I don't want to talk about talking about the question that I raised. I want to have it answered.