AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - SA Secret Service app process

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

SA Secret Service app process (Read 14176 times)

WJ User Offline Posts: 30 Location: Washington D.C. Joined: Jul 14^th, 2007 Gender:	SA Secret Service app process Jul 14^th, 2007 at 6:07pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I'm coming out of the military as an officer and have applied to the USSS. I went through my initial interview with supposedy flying colors and have been asked to take the TEA exam. I've been studying and studying for the exam via the ARCO books. The math portion seems the hardest. -Does anyone have any tips for the TEA exam? I've used a tutor and been studying. -What should I expect from the polygraph? Do the counter-measures really work? What are my chances? WJ

	Counter-measures were easy.
	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #1 - Jul 15^th, 2007 at 7:45am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Regarding what to expect on the polygraph, see Chapter 3 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector: https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf and the "Law Enforcement Pre-Employment Test" examiner's guide: https://antipolygraph.org/documents/dodpi-lepet.pdf Although use of countermeasures does not guarantee that one will pass, there is no doubt but that polygraph techniques are susceptible to countermeasures, and the polygraph community has no demonstrated ability to detect them. For more on countermeasures, see Chapter 4 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.
	« Last Edit: Jul 15^th, 2007 at 4:16pm by George W. Maschke »
	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

WJ User Offline Posts: 30 Location: Washington D.C. Joined: Jul 14^th, 2007 Gender:	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #2 - Jul 16^th, 2007 at 4:05pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	It seems that most of the people on these forums have failed the polygraph as opposed to passing the polygraph. Is anyone here who has passed the USSS SA polygraph?

	Counter-measures were easy.
	IP Logged

quickfix Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 368 Joined: Jan 15^th, 2006	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #3 - Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures.


	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #4 - Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:30pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm: Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures. You mean like these people (myself included) "who didn't foolishly try countermeasures?" https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml As the experience of many has shown, telling the truth is no guarantee of passing the polygraph. Considering that the polygraph community has no reliable method of countermeasure detection, it is hard to see how using countermeasures is in any way foolish. On the contrary, considering that polygraphy is inherently biased against the truthful, it might be foolhardy not to use readily available, easily learned countermeasures to reduce the risk of a false positive outcome.

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

quickfix Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 368 Joined: Jan 15^th, 2006	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #5 - Jul 17^th, 2007 at 9:34pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm: Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures. You mean like these people (myself included) "who didn't foolishly try countermeasures?" https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml As the experience of many has shown, telling the truth is no guarantee of passing the polygraph. Considering that the polygraph community has no reliable method of countermeasure detection, it is hard to see how using countermeasures is in any way foolish. On the contrary, considering that polygraphy is inherently biased against the truthful, it might be foolhardy not to use readily available, easily learned countermeasures to reduce the risk of a false positive outcome. Oops, I should have added, "or who were truthful to the relevant questions." That certainly excludes you.


	IP Logged

WJ User Offline Posts: 30 Location: Washington D.C. Joined: Jul 14^th, 2007 Gender:	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #6 - Jul 17^th, 2007 at 11:24pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 9:34pm: Quote: quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm: Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures. You mean like these people (myself included) "who didn't foolishly try countermeasures?" https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml As the experience of many has shown, telling the truth is no guarantee of passing the polygraph. Considering that the polygraph community has no reliable method of countermeasure detection, it is hard to see how using countermeasures is in any way foolish. On the contrary, considering that polygraphy is inherently biased against the truthful, it might be foolhardy not to use readily available, easily learned countermeasures to reduce the risk of a false positive outcome. Oops, I should have added, "or who were truthful to the relevant questions." That certainly excludes you. What does the highest court in the land say? Oh yeah.....their against it, I wonder why.

	Counter-measures were easy.
	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #7 - Jul 18^th, 2007 at 3:28am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 9:34pm: Quote: quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm: Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures. You mean like these people (myself included) "who didn't foolishly try countermeasures?" https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml As the experience of many has shown, telling the truth is no guarantee of passing the polygraph. Considering that the polygraph community has no reliable method of countermeasure detection, it is hard to see how using countermeasures is in any way foolish. On the contrary, considering that polygraphy is inherently biased against the truthful, it might be foolhardy not to use readily available, easily learned countermeasures to reduce the risk of a false positive outcome. Oops, I should have added, "or who were truthful to the relevant questions." That certainly excludes you. No, it certainly does not. I answered all relevant questions truthfully on both my FBI and LAPD polygraph screening examinations. In the former case, I was falsely accused of deception, and in the latter, I was falsely accused of employing countermeasures. (I didn't even know what countermeasures are at the time.)

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

quickfix Especially Senior User Offline Posts: 368 Joined: Jan 15^th, 2006	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #8 - Jul 19^th, 2007 at 6:11pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 9:34pm: Quote: quickfix wrote on Jul 17^th, 2007 at 6:21pm: Yea, the ones who didn't foolishly try countermeasures. You mean like these people (myself included) "who didn't foolishly try countermeasures?" https://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml As the experience of many has shown, telling the truth is no guarantee of passing the polygraph. Considering that the polygraph community has no reliable method of countermeasure detection, it is hard to see how using countermeasures is in any way foolish. On the contrary, considering that polygraphy is inherently biased against the truthful, it might be foolhardy not to use readily available, easily learned countermeasures to reduce the risk of a false positive outcome. Oops, I should have added, "or who were truthful to the relevant questions." That certainly excludes you. No, it certainly does not. I answered all relevant questions truthfully on both my FBI and LAPD polygraph screening examinations. In the former case, I was falsely accused of deception, and in the latter, I was falsely accused of employing countermeasures. (I didn't even know what countermeasures are at the time.) Of course you did, George, of course. Just keep on repeating, I told the truth. I told the truth. Don't forget to click your heels three times.


	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: SA Secret Service app process Reply #9 - Jul 20^th, 2007 at 10:50am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	quickfix wrote on Jul 19^th, 2007 at 6:11pm: Of course you did, George, of course. Just keep on repeating, I told the truth. I told the truth. Don't forget to click your heels three times. If you would have others believe that I lied on my FBI and/or LAPD polygraph screening examinations, please back your assertion with evidence, not taunts. I note that you yourself have averred elsewhere on this message board: quickfix wrote on Mar 6^th, 2006 at 12:02am: "I for one would NEVER take an FBI poly (yes, you're hearing it from an examiner!!)"

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

SA Secret Service app process

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.