Quote:I WON'T GO INTO DETAIL BECAUSE U GUYS ARE JUST TOO IGNORANT TO SEE WHAT IS BEFORE YOU.
Franco,
The first impulse is to ignore your post as just another tin foil hat fantasy. However, as a person with some novice understanding of these issues, I consider it my obligation to at least give you the truth. Then, if you wish to continue with this fantasy, you are on your own to meander around never never land.
There has been some initial research done on other methods to gain insight into mental states beyond sampling peripheral psychophysiological indices like those recorded by the polygraph.
First, some research involving electroencephalographic brain event related potentials has been accomplished, specifically in using the P300 brainwave to detect recognition, as in the GKT. 21st Century technology requires attaching sensors to the scalp to monitor these signals.
Similarly, the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging, used in current research involving neuroimaging, has shown some success in evaluting certain portions of the brain, particularly the inferior lateral prefrontal cortex, as showing heightened activity during deception. Again, 21st Century technology does not include sensors with sufficient sensitivity and directivity to remotely accomplish fMRI.
The only rudamentary remote sensing available would be thermal imaging, which could target the area around the eyes. However extrapolating thermal variation around the eyes to deception is still experimental to say the least.
So, I recommend you screw the crystal lever into your time machine and come back to 2015. Your fears are unjustified in our current era.