Quote: Man, I tell you what. Hope you don't have to go through the post test-interview like I did. I was innocent and already told them everything I knew....
Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it, I did not go through a post-test interview. The end of my employment screen was pretty much, thanks for coming...have a good one. The context of my test differed from yours. Your's a criminal matter (specific incident), mine a pre-employment screening (broad based). That's really no matter though. The polygraph decisions are subjective and many times completely incorrect. The other times...flip the coin and get it right.
To continue the discussion regarding admissibility in court: For New Mexico see statute 11-707 C
http://nxt.ella.net/NXT/gateway.dll?f=templates$fn=default.htm$vid=nm:all According to the book
A Tremor in the Blood: uses and abuses of the lie detector by Dr. David T. Lykken published in 1998, states in which stipulated lie tests are admissible include: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. States that do not allow polygraph decisions into evidence include: Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin.