|
Mom, I think you would be truely surprised as to just how many people have either used or experimented with drugs in their teens and 20s. I can't quote you any hard figures, but when I was a high school student in the 70s, that figure would be ............ very high. I think that many did it out of peer pressure, not because they truely enjoyed it. Same thing with alcohol. As for calling Ted a drug dealer, I don't think that is fair. He very well may have sold some joints to a friend, so he could ride in his Camaro and meet some "groovy chicks." Ok, I'm dating myself here......This hardly qualifies him as a card carrying member of the Medellin drug cartel. More than likely, he was just a dumb kid doing it to be "cool." As for his boasting here on the internet......well, this is the antipolygraph website. He proved without a doubt how worthless the polygraph is, and that it can be easily defeated with properly used countermeasures. Now, for your son....... He sounds like a very decent person. Maybe too nice of a guy. However, I think that he has taken the whole polygraph experience too personal. Like Michael Corleone said in The Godfather, "it's not personal Sonny, it's strictly business." This is the attitude that your son needs to take if he ever applies to another police agency. He now realizes how bogus the polygraph is, and he can plan ahead this time and defeat it. He needs to forget about what he thinks is right and wrong, what he considers to be ethical or unethical, he just needs to do what he has to do in order to secure the job. Sound harsh? Hey, life isn't fair. If he doesn't do this, he will never get past the BI/polygraph phase. How ethical is it to base an entire BI on the basis of a polygraph exam? I think it's completely unethical since I consider it (the polygraph) basic witchcraft. The police dept feels differently, so since they are the ones doing the hiring, we have to play by their rules. I think there is such a thing as being too honest and forthcoming to these investigators. You open up a Pandora's Box whenever you volunteer information. Does it mean anything today that you stole a Snickers Bar 20 years ago at the 7-11? No, it's irrelevant......so why bother trying to explain this non event in your life? Are you catching my drift here? You mentioned that you would admit to anyone who asked, that you researched the polygraph. I have already addressed this in another post, and I will reiterate that I think this is bad advise. Remember that while you are in the hotseat, you need to give the appearance that you are playing the examiner's game. Admitting to knowing all about control questions, countermeasures, etc.....sends the wrong message to the examiner, and I guarantee you that he will be suspicious. My advise is to play dumb and use countermeasures. Ok, my fingers are tired now.......... Kona
|