STOP FEEDING THE TROLLS!!! 

Eastwood,

I filed CPRA to get the tapes and charts to help my case, as cited in previous posts, but they have been denied.

That's part of the problem.  If polygraphy was a 'science' there would be no need to hide the tapes or charts.  Transparency is obviosly not a buzz word that is popular among polygraphers.

On this site you can read hundreds of similar complaints of unprofessional conduct by polygraphers- the majority of which never get investigated.   Like a criminal that gets away with a petty crime, they keep pushing the boundaries until they get caught. 

Are there good polygraphers out there? 

1)When you realize the serious flaw in the PLCQT ( a presummed standard response to a control question) you are left to wonder!

2) Then factor in the abusive questioning and scare tactics.

3)Then add in the NAS report.

4)sprinkle on a few ex-polygraphers that have come clean.

It all adds up to a No!

It's no scientifc, it's not accurate, it's based on deception.  It's not an investigative tool- its an electronic 3rd degree- if they don't want you- you will not pass!

Of course these two 'professionals' have had problems before!  But with no way to prove my case (no tapes), these guys will just get an in-house slap on the wrist.    The department will cover it up and I will end up taking a job with another agency.

I used to view LE as a brotherhood of people who care.  I was gung-ho (still am ).  But this episode has made me keenly aware that there is corruption within.   

I guess some people will do anything for a few $$$!!!