Normal Topic Re: Absolute shock (Read 3685 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6223
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: Absolute shock
Mar 23rd, 2003 at 10:26am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
kalle,

I understand well your shock. I and many others have also told the truth and been falsely accused of deception by polygraph operators. You need to know that polygraph "testing" is a fraud: it has no scientific basis whatsoever, and actually has an inherent bias against the truthful, because the more candidly one answers the so-called "control" questions, the more likely one is to fail. Download The Lie Behind the Lie Detector and read chapters 1 & 3 to learn about the chicanery, dubious assumptions, and flawed logic behind the "test."

At this point, it is important that you appeal the polygraph results in writing. Respectfully explain that you told the truth and request a second examination. It is important that you do this, because your silence will be interpreted as your acceptance of the results.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Broken
New User
*
Offline



Posts: 15
Joined: Aug 26th, 2002
Gender: Female
Re: Absolute shock
Reply #1 - Mar 23rd, 2003 at 11:39pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Will another polygraph really help?  If they are not reliable in the first place, why should a second test be requested?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6223
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: Absolute shock
Reply #2 - Mar 24th, 2003 at 12:36am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Broken,

For law enforcement applicants who become the victims of a false positive outcome, a second polygraph may or may not help. But requesting it is typically the only practical avenue of appeal available.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box A True Libertarian
New User
*
Offline


"Wake up it's 1984!"

Posts: 17
Joined: Aug 28th, 2002
Gender: Male
Re: Absolute shock
Reply #3 - Apr 3rd, 2003 at 2:13pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Kalle:

I am sorry to learn about your negative polygragh experience. I, too, have been victimized by the polygraph insitution. It's ignorant and uneducated disciples should be held accountable on a civil level. But, do not hold your breath! This institution is resilient and won't go down without a strong fight. The good news, this website is a pioneer in exposing the truth and identifying the flaws of the polygraph.

Polygraph testing is a fraud! Phd level scientist have concluded that the polygraph is no more reliable than a "flip of a coin."  Uneducated and indoctrinated members of lawenforcement have concluded such exams are accurate and an effective method of pre-employment screening?? In short, those who can think on a critical level, overwhelmingly  dispute the viability of the polygraph; those who are incapable of thinking for themselves are its' biggest advocate! 

If you are truly interested in lawenforcement as a career, retake the exam. However, bear in mind (assumming you pass the second time), that you will be entering a field that not only endorses this flawed device, but also considers it as a extremely useful tool to eliminate undesirable candiates. This, perhaps, is the most difficult contention of the polygraph community to refute. After all (please read with a tone of sarcasm intented), since the introduction of polygraph screening, reports of police misconduct, abuse, and violations of civil liberties have been almost non-existent
(lol, lol, lol,!!)!
« Last Edit: Apr 21st, 2003 at 11:11am by A True Libertarian »  

"To seek the truth one must be willing to thoroughly explore all sides of an issue, even if doing so challenges an individual's core beliefs and values. To do otherwise, only lays a foundation for dogma and ignorance!"&&&&A True Libertarian!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box orolan
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 363
Joined: Dec 25th, 2002
Re: Absolute shock
Reply #4 - Apr 3rd, 2003 at 5:27pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
One can only hope that a candidate such as kalle can get a second exam, pass it, and go to work for the FHP. Officers who have had to deal with the inconsistencies of polygraphs hopefully would view them with a somewhat jaundiced eye when the suggestion came up to use one in an investigation. This may actually further the demise of the polygraph, a goal we all work towards.
  

"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." &&U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Re: Absolute shock

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X