An American,

I suspect that you have fallen into the truth and that Robin Hood's post (which may or may not be an illegal act itself) does lead one via a link to a copyright violation (a criminal violation).  This, though, is neither your nor Mr. Maschke’s responsibility to independently determine.  If Mr. Williams believes such has occurred (i.e., his material has been properly copyrighted and that copyright has been infringed upon, he (Mr. Williams) should contact proper authorities and when those proper authorities in due course advise Mr. Maschke that they believe a violation of law has taken place, no doubt Mr. Maschke when properly advised (and requested to do so) will remove that (Robin Hood post) which might further said violation.  Any removal prior to such time would only set a very poor precedent and allow anyone who did want censorship to scurrilously litter the message board landscape with questionable posts and then call for broad removal of material. 

The issue of censorship arises in connection with your name, not because you appear to be a pro-polygraph spokesperson and because we are unaware of a single pro-polygraph site that does not practice censorship, but because of your complete lack of thought process, ensuing reckless allegations and would be censorship regarding the material connected with that which has been entitled Al-Qaeda Documentation on Lie Detection.  You have only yourself to blame for the perceptions you have created.

Mark
I must confess your evidence seems shakey.  I think you took me to task for good investigative procedure and now your merely working like a street cop! Welcome back to LE mark, we could use you.  I bet you could pass a screening test to get back in!
On a serious note ( I have not read your personal statement ) what type of test were you given in your ordeal, I presume you failed a specific issue test?

Mark
Ok thanks. Ill read your statement before making any other comments, or asking questions.