They are furious because at the least, the test subject has no anxiety over the test because he is informed and knows the psychological techniques used.  Guess what gentlemen, SO DO ALL OF THE SPIES!!!!   

Some time ago (11/27/01) as part of a post largely dealing with DoDPI-sanctioned criteria for determining the presence of respiratory-channel response(s), I reiterated a challenge to the polygraph community that I had first made in a public presentation (10/17/01) to the National Academy of Sciences panel investigating the validity of polygraph screening.  That challenge (which has not yet been accepted or even really responded to) was made as follows:


Although I am happy for this basic format to be modified to a design having sufficient power to reasonably allow for reaching levels of statistical significance for any results obtained, I believe it is very important that this process and outcome(s) be publicly available and, if possible, covered by any interested media outlet.  I believe this is an appropriate time to renew this challenge for the following reasons: (1) It has languished far too long without a meaningful reply, (2) As we begin a new year, it will be interesting to see how far in the year we progress with those who promote CQT polygraph testing continuing to cower from the truth about its weaknesses, and (3) the current thread dealing with the validity of polygraph screening should be viewed in the light of realizing that any (I believe substantial) lack of validity of CQT polygraph testing in the absence of countermeasures is only greatly exacerbated with the application of properly applied countermeasures.

Your challenge has been addressed in a different string on this web site.

I believe the person responding was another examiner that stated he would take on the challenge under the conditions that if the examiner succeeded in beating the person making the challenge, that antipolygraph.org and it's rights would be turned over to him.

if the examiner failed you guys get bragging rights and his licenses and he would never run another test again.

I thought this was a fair acceptance and wager. But I have yet to see you step up.

Seems there is a lot of talk. This guy was going to put up and all other posters ragged him down until I guess he left. I Guess that is how people are silenced here. Would you are the "spy" be willing to put the web domain on line to prove your points or not. 

If not, doesn't that make you bigger cowards then the "evil people" you hate so very much.

I will find you answer both entertaining and amusing.

Put something on the table. If your minions fail there should be a price and that price should be antipolygraph.org and it's rights to be given up to the winning examiner.

The only begging I will hear some day is "Please don't take my web site". Because it is my mission now to not only make polygraph commonly admissable, but to take that chalenge and take this web site. If I don't I will give up my license and by then I will be bigger than Backster or Reid. That is my Goal.

Can you say !!! BUSTED !!!!!!!

I thought those posts a familiar odor !!! 

Guess you were deamed deceptive (DI) again ODIN.

  

Second, it is evident that you lack the requisite credentials.