Normal Topic L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep. (Read 14810 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6230
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
Sep 21st, 2001 at 2:13am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
On Monday, 24 Sep. 2001, the Public Safety Committee of the Los Angeles City Council will be holding a meeting at which LAPD hiring practices, including polygraph screening, are on the agenda. The schedule includes time for comments from the public, and any who can attend may wish to be there:


PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2001

ROOM 1010, CITY HALL - 10 AM
200 N. SPRING ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

*** PLEASE NOTE NEW COMMITTEE ROOM LOCATION ***

      MEMBERS:  COUNCILMEMBER CINDY MISCIKOWSKI, CHAIR
                   COUNCILMEMBER JAN PERRY
                   COUNCILMEMBER JACK WEISS
                COUNCILMEMBER NICK PACHECO
                   COUNCILMEMBER DENNIS P. ZINE
                

     (Brian Walters - Legislative Assistant - 213-978-1078)      
_________________________________________________________________

Note: Assistive listening devices are available at the meeting; upon 72 hour advance notice, other accommodations, such as sign language interpretation, and translation services will be provided.  Contact the Legislative Assistant listed above for the needed services.  TDD available at (213) 978-1055.


FILE NO. SUBJECT

                                   (1)

-------      City Attorney and Chief Legislative Analyst to provide an update on the implementation status of the Consent Decree and other related matters.

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________


                                   (2)

-------      Chief Legislative Analyst to provide an update on the implementation status of TEAMS II.

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________


                                   (3)

-------      Police Department to report relative to the Depart ment’s plan and implementation time line for collection of pedestrian and traffic stop data on paper forms to meet the Consent Decree November 1, 2001 implementation schedule and associated costs.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________

                                   (4)

           Scheduled for Council consideration - September 25,2001
00-0211-      Consideration of Motion (Miscikowski - Pacheco)relative 
S31            to transfer of funds for printing costs of pedestrian and traffic stop data collection forms and data input scanning services.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION______________________________________

                                   (5)

-------      Chief Legislative Analyst to report relative to a lease for the Los Angeles Police Department, Special Opera tions Section, Internal Affairs Group and associated budget needs and required fund transfers.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION______________________________________


                                   (6)

99-1803-S1      Communications from the Police Department relative to the status of its hiring and recruitment efforts for the period ending June 2001. (Also referred to the Personnel Committee)

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________
     
                                   (7)

99-1803-S7      Communication from the Police Department relative to the use of bumper stickers to enhance police officer recruitment.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________

                                   (8)
     
01-0572      Communications from the Personnel Department relative to its monthly activities to improve recruitment and selection of Police Office candidates for the periods ending May, June, July and August 2001. (Also referred to the Personnel Committee)

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION___________________________________________


                                   (9)

01-1586      Personnel and Police Department report relative to the recent Memorandum of Agreement, the resources and authorities needed to fund its coordinated efforts, and any other related police officer recruitment and retention matters, pursuant to Motion (Miscikowski - Weiss) (Also referred to the Personnel and Budget and Finance Committees)

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________

                                   (10)

--------      City Administrative Officer to report relative to the Police Department’s Interim Budget request for poly graph unit positions.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: No

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________

                                   (11)

------      Communication from the Personnel Department relative to a personal services contract with US Investigation Services, Inc. for polygraph and investigative services and reprogramming of funds for the Police Officer Recruitment Incentive Program.

           Fiscal Impact Statement Submitted: Yes, by Dept.

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________


                                   (12)

01-0219-      Consideration of Motion (Padilla - Miscikowski)
S1            relative to the revised Integrity Assurance Package for the Police Department’s Risk Management Group, for an additional 63 position authorities.

           DISPOSITION__________________________________________

     

COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC ON ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
WITHIN COMMITTEE'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION





« Last Edit: Sep 21st, 2001 at 2:28am by George W. Maschke »  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fred F.
Very Senior User
****
Offline


Get Educated.... Knowledge
is Power

Posts: 225
Joined: Apr 4th, 2001
Re: L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
Reply #1 - Sep 21st, 2001 at 2:50am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George,

What is ironic about the LA City Council meeting is that it is scheduled for 10 AM. This makes it very inconvenient for most of the public to attend. Most people cannot leave work, pay to park downtown, find the room and listen in on the meeting without sacrificing a few hours of pay.

One has to wonder if the LA City Council is interested in what their constituents have to say, especially LA City residents and who have been victims of LAPD's horrible hiring procedures that are worse with the inclusion of the polygraph. 

This is good example of how isolated the LA City Council is from the public. In my City, the meetings where held at night and the public could voice their gratitude and displeasure with City officials and to get specific questions answered. 

Government works for you, but does the LA City Council value the input of LA City residents? It appears that they don't


Fred F.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6230
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
Reply #2 - Sep 26th, 2001 at 7:41am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Fred F.,

I agree that the scheduling of L.A. City Council meetings at 10:00 A.M. must make attendance difficult for many. Fortunately, David Zahniser of the Daily Breeze was in attendance and wrote an article on it titled, "Panel seeks to speed LAPD hiring."

Some points of note with regard to the LAPD polygraph program:

  • A backlog of more than 500 LAPD applicants wait to be polygraphed;
  • The Committee voted to recommend that a private company (presumably US Investigation Services, Inc., which was mentioned on the agenda but not in Zahniser's article) be awarded a contract of up to $615,000 to address that backlog;
  • The Committee also recommended that LAPD establish four new permanent positions for polygraphers.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fred F.
Very Senior User
****
Offline


Get Educated.... Knowledge
is Power

Posts: 225
Joined: Apr 4th, 2001
Re: L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
Reply #3 - Sep 27th, 2001 at 5:24am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  

Quote:
  • The Committee voted to recommend that a private company (presumably US Investigation Services, Inc., which was mentioned on the agenda but not in Zahniser's article) be awarded a contract of up to $615,000 to address that backlog;
  • The Committee also recommended that LAPD establish four new permanent positions for polygraphers.



  • George,

    $615,000 to do 500 polygraphs.....that works out to $1230 a PERSON and $410 dollars an HOUR figuring it takes about 3 hours to do one test. 

    So if they hire 4 polygraphers would they pay them that kind of money to someone who may or may not have any formal education other than an 8 - 10 weeks of "training" in how to do a polygraph.

    Only in LA

    Fred F. Wink
      
    Back to top
     
    IP Logged
     
    Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
    Global Moderator
    *****
    Offline


    Make-believe science yields
    make-believe security.

    Posts: 6230
    Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
    Re: L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
    Reply #4 - Sep 27th, 2001 at 8:05am
    Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
    Fred F.,

    The total number of polygraph interrogations that might be provided under the contract is not clear. Note also that the Daily Breeze article mentioned that it is in an amount up to $615,000. It's not clear from the article whether that amount would be applied only to clearing the present backlog, or if it would include potential future backlogs, too. 

    See also the article, "LAPD Expands Recruitment Efforts" on the MSNBC website, which is about the same Public Safety Committee meeting, and states in part:

    Quote:
    The panel unanimously forwarded to the full council Deputy Chief Michael Bostic's request to approve the creation of several new positions, all of which he said were needed to staff a pilot recruitment program.

    "I think the LAPD can ill afford cost-cutting measures on staff when we're at the breaking point where we are now," Bostic said.

    Among the positions that need to be filled, Bostic said, are polygraph examiners to administer tests to LAPD applicants as part of their background checks.

    "Earlier in the year, we asked for eight polygraph examiners; we got six. So, surprise surprise, we're 800 backlogged and now we're trying to play catch up," he said.


    When the Daily Breeze reported the backlog to be "more than 500" it seems to have made an understatement.
      

    George W. Maschke
    I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
    Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
    E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
    Wire: @ap_org
    Threema: A4PYDD5S
    Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
    Back to top
    IP Logged
     
    Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
    Global Moderator
    *****
    Offline


    Make-believe science yields
    make-believe security.

    Posts: 6230
    Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
    Mayor Hahn's Letter to the BOC
    Reply #5 - Oct 6th, 2001 at 8:41pm
    Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
    Mayor Kenneth Hahn, in a letter to the Board of Police Commissioners dated 5 October 2001, recommended, among other things, the hiring of additional polygraphers:

    Quote:

    Streamline the Hiring Process for Sworn Police Officers: One of the primary causes of delay in the hiring process is the inordinate amount of time it takes to administer polygraph examinations. The Public Safety Committee has been addressing this issue, and the Personnel Department was recently given the authority to enter into a six-month contract to reduce the number of outstanding polygraph examinations. Concurrently, the Personnel Department will aggressively attempt to hire additional polygraph examiners to invigorate the City’s polygraph examination process. Reducing this type of delay will go a long way toward achieving Commissioner Boeckmann’s goal of a 100-day hiring process.


    Mayor Hahn's letter can be downloaded in PDF format at:

    http://www.lacity.org/mayor/myrpress/policeco.pdf

    A better way to streamline the hiring process would be to scrap the polygraph requirement.
      

    George W. Maschke
    I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
    Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
    E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
    Wire: @ap_org
    Threema: A4PYDD5S
    Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
    Back to top
    IP Logged
     
    Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Fred F.
    Very Senior User
    ****
    Offline


    Get Educated.... Knowledge
    is Power

    Posts: 225
    Joined: Apr 4th, 2001
    Re: L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.
    Reply #6 - Oct 7th, 2001 at 5:32am
    Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
    George,

    Mayor Hahns letter brings out some other points that are equally disturbing;

    He wants to start recruiting at the High Schoollevel.
    Quote:

    Support of Police Academy Magnet Schools: High School programs for students
    interested in law enforcement as a career have been in place for several years.
    Currently, there are five high school campuses that offer the program, which has proven
    to be key to the education and inspiration of the high school cadets to serve the
    community as members of the Los Angeles Police Department in the near future.
    Students travel great distances because they feel the Police Academy Magnet provides
    them a strong sense of community. To increase the number of LAPD recruits, I believe
    we should increase the police academy programs.


    The good Mayor is forgetting that you have to be 21 to be appointed to the LAPD. Also, to get young peoples involved in a waiting process is absurd. Making them civilian members of the LAPD to be paperwork jockeys or clerks can have a negative effect as these students will see police work as boring and repetitious and make them lose interest. Also this discourages a college education, but that may be what they want, people without knowledge that they can mold into their model of an officer

    However he does have a good idea in forgiving college debt as a recruiting tool
    Quote:

    Create Scholarship Opportunities for Police Recruits: The City should recruit
    college students to serve as sworn officers for LAPD. We should consider offering
    scholarships or loan forgiveness programs for those who agree to serve a specified
    amount of time in the Department. As you know, other cities offer law enforcement
    recruits an array of education incentives and we must be sure that we are keeping pace
    with other police departments.


    While this is a good idea, If the officer still becomes disillusioned all they need to do is put in the time and start applying to other PD's that offer more lucrative work schedules and assignments. The LASD does NOT forgive college debt, but does allow many to advertise freely to the entire dept. The LASD also has tuition reimbursement.

    The most important point still is to scrap the polygraph requirement. 

    Fred F. Wink
      
    Back to top
     
    IP Logged
     
    L.A. City Council Mtg. Monday, 24 Sep.

    Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
    Open Preview Preview

    You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
    Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
    Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                           
    Change Text Color
    Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
    resize_wb
    resize_hb







    Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
    Text size: pt
    More Smilies
    View All Smilies
    Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
    Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
    Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
    Attachment 1:
    X