Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 1 post(s).
Posted by: Dan Mangan
Posted on: Sep 9th, 2015 at 4:59pm
  Mark & Quote
The people have spoken, much to the dismay of the APA's Board of Directors.

In a stunning upset, the American Polygraph Association Board of Directors failed to quash my run for APA president-elect in 2016.

At the APA annual business meeting on September 1st, the Board of Directors caved in to pressure from members who made it clear that their freedom of choice was not to be hijacked by the organization's politicos.

To learn more about the proposed restrictions -- designed to prevent challenges from political outsiders -- go here: https://antipolygraph.org/blog/2015/07/06/american-polygraph-association-seeks-t...

Once APA members got wind of the political maneuvering behind the proposed change, it was doomed. 

Here's why:

1. Members saw that it was discriminatory.

2. It would have deprived the electorate of the freedom of choice that it has enjoyed for the past fifty (50) years.

3. The rule would have immediately disenfranchised approximately 30% of the voting electorate at the very least, that is, those individuals who would be inclined to vote for me in 2016.

All in all, it was a stupid idea, driven -- at least in my view -- by fear, loathing and hubris. Little wonder it went down in flames.

I give my sincerest thanks to my supporters -- and to every other APA member who is a critical thinker and polygraph realist (regardless of their political alignment) -- for their help in defeating the APA Board of Directors' power grab.

Thank you.

The campaign for 2016 starts now.
 
  Top