Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 1 post(s).
Posted by: federalapplicant
Posted on: Mar 24th, 2006 at 8:24pm
  Mark & Quote
OK, so I just got through my 1st poly...not as bad as I thought, although there were some positive and negative signs and I'm not quite sure what to make of them.

I breezed through the national security questions, but then, about mid-test, my polygrapher said I was 'showing some reaction' to the drug, crime, and withholding info questions.  Of course, I had been truthful, and it is already documented on my form that I did try marijuana many years ago.  The crime and withholding questions were absurd, since I have never come close to commiting any crime, nor have I withheld info.  Anyways, I was sort of expecting this line of questioning, and actually I believe it was a bluff to try to extract more info out of me, which you might agree with in a minute.  After about 30 minutes of the usual 'What might be causing these fluctuations?', or 'What is the worst thing you've ever done?', he informed me that he would conduct one more round of questions, asking me if I am 'specifically' withholding information from him.  So, after the 1st chart, he told me it looked like I was 'settling back down' and that the charts looked good again.  This is why I think he was bluffing in the first place, because I had never been 'unsettled' in the 1st place, or at least I didn't feel so.  I was basically completely relaxed and calm, as I had nothing to hide.  After 2 more charts of these specific questions about withholding info, he said we're done, and started unhooking me while explaining to me that I am now under the rules and regs of the organization...anything I do from now on is subject to their rules...blah blah blah...and we walked out.  All the time he was very friendly.

So, he never actually accused me of deception, just implored me as to why I might be showing 'unusual' activity for the crime and drug questions.  He was very friendly during this phase, and never confrontational.  I got the feeling like it was just a 'routine' for him, which is why I think it might have just been a bluff, and that my charts were clean to begin with.  Is this possible?  The other positive sign was when he was taking the last set of questions and said I was 'settling down' again and looked good.  What do you suppose I should make of this?   

Also, was our little chat during the test about my 'worst thing ever done' considered a 'post-test interview' even though it was technically mid-test, or is a post-test interview strictly considered to be after unhooking?   

(Maybe I should note that during the mid-test interview, I did not confess to anything that wasn't already on my forms, which makes perfect sense because there was nothing to confess)

Thanks.
 
  Top