Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Sep 25th, 2005 at 8:58am
  Mark & Quote
ladyleo,

Your decision not to submit to a lie detector "test" is well founded. But your plan to forge a polygraph report is ill-conceived. Sample polygraph reports are easy enough to find on-line. But while polygraph operators may not disclose results to unknown third parties, if a person contacts one explaining, "I have a copy of a report signed by you stating that you polygraphed ladyleo on such and such a date, asked such and such questions, and that no deception was indicated. Can you confirm this?" then I don't think any polygrapher would have any problem confirming that the report is a forgery.

I think a better and more ethical approach would be to let your husband and other family members know that polygraph testing has no scienific basis and a passed or failed polygraph is evidence of...nothing.

You might give your husband a printout of Professor William G. Iacono's article, "Forensic 'Lie Detection': Procedures Without Scientific Basis":

http://antipolygraph.org/articles/article-018.shtml

as well as Dr. Drew C. Richardson's evaluation and opinion of CQT polygraphy:

http://antipolygraph.org/articles/article-028.shtml

You can also refer him to our e-book The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, which explains how to pass a polygraph whether or not one is telling the truth. If you were a liar, you could have simply taken the polygraph and used countermeasures to pass:

http://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf
Posted by: ladyleo
Posted on: Sep 25th, 2005 at 8:25am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Please help....my husband and I sepreated, the divorce is almost final. He suspects I cheated on him. And insisted on a polygraph test. I am innocent and very hurt that after 20 years he would think of me like this. I refuse to let a machine speak for me. And will keep my money in my pocket! i have given him no reason to doubt me. I want him to realize how a machine decided the fate of his marriage/family. Therfor, I would however like to....suggest to family memebers that I indeed have taken a test. As I know this info will get back to him. However, I would need to mail myself some type of letter indicating the results/scores (in my favor of course). What type of info is typically seen in a letter, regarding infedility test results? And if a polygrapher is contacted to confirm such a letter. Is any acknowledgement made? Or is it strictly "confidentiality"? Any info would be appreciated.
Thanks
ladyleo
 
  Top