Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: gdb_65 (Guest)
Posted on: Jan 16th, 2003 at 9:46am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Thank you, Thats what we thought too.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 16th, 2003 at 9:26am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
gdb_65,

I am not a lawyer, but I believe that your wife may have strong grounds for bringing suit against her former employer under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. Under Section 2006(d), it appears that the employer's request that employees (who presumably had access to the missing computers) submit to polygraph "testing" was lawful. However, Section 2007(a) prohibits firing or otherwise discriminating against an employee based solely on an analysis of polygraph charts (or refusal to be polygraphed).

I think you and your wife should consult with one or more trial lawyers experienced in labor law. Martindale's free Lawyer Locator service may be of assistance in this regard.
Posted by: gdb_65
Posted on: Jan 16th, 2003 at 4:38am
  Mark & Quote
Aboout a month ago a computer was stolen from my wifes work. There was information on the computer that could be damaging to several people. An administrator was asked to resign or be fired. soon after, the same computer this person used was missing. There was alot of damaging e-mails sent from that machine about other employees and damaging to the business, due to wrong practices. within a month the company had decided to poly everyone. Unknowing  and relying on what the actual test is called "A LIE DETECTOR TEST" my wife was the first to sign up. They did the test and said my wife had a couple of strange answers. So I decided to do some research and found out this was all normal for the examiner to act like everyone is guilty. So I did the normal thing any husband would do knowing his wife has been falsely accused!. I confronted the so called manager that requested the employees take the test. Only to have him tell me they were not accusing her And they are sorry she is having a nervous breakdown. The test results were called back today and my wife fired On the spot through a conference call.(the bastard didnt even have the nuts to tell her himself). They said, She was the only one to fail the test Out of 11 people. The thing is she is not lying!!! she told the whole truth!!! And did not steal anything ever from her employer now or past! We did not get a test results report,in written form. What the hell do we do now??? any help would be appreciated...
 
  Top