Failed FBI poly, what happens next?

Started by FBI_SA_appl, Mar 31, 2005, 03:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

charlie9

"To tell you the truth, if I got a letter saying they were withdrawing my employment offer and that I could appeal the decision and ask to be retested, I don't think it's worth going through all of that again just to work for the FBI.  I'm an honest and loyal person, and I know and others know that I'm a good person, so too heck with the FBI for putting anyone that's honest through all that again.   I think the Polygraph is a bunch of bull.  I have never believed in them, and whoever invented it needs to be spanked.  It's utterly ridiculous."

HALEY-
I WANT TO TELL YOU I AGREE WITH YOUR WORDS HERE.  LIKE MANY PEOPLE HERE, I HAVE HAD DREAMS FOR MANY YEARS TO BE A FBI SPECIAL AGENT.  I AM LAW STUDENT CURRENTLY, AND I TRIED TO GET A NON-PAID INTERNSHIP WITH THE FBI.  YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE POLYGRAPH PROCESS LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AND I EITHER FAILED THE DRUG PORTION OR IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE...I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH.  I THINK IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE BECAUSE HE KEPT SAYING I WAS SHOWING A RESPONSE TO THOSE QUESTIONS.  REGARDLESS, THE ENTIRE PROCESS WAS A NIGHTMARE.  IT WAS INDEED MORE LIKE A CRIMINAL INTERROGATION THAN A JOB INTERVIEW.  I FELT BAD FOR AWHILE...THEN I STARTED THINKING ABOUT IT...AND HONESTLY, I WOULD RATHER NOT SPEND MY CAREER (AND MY LIFE) WORKING FOR AN AGENCY THAT TREATS PEOPLE THAT WAY.  IT MADE ME BITTER TOWARDS THE GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL, IN THAT WE HAVE AN AGENCY DESIGNED TO PROTECT AMERICANS, YET WE ALLOW THEM TO SUBMIT LOYAL US CITIZENS TO SUCH A SCREENING PROCESS.  IT IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS IN MY OPINION.  I AM AS AMERICAN AS THEY COME, I HAVE NEVER USED DRUGS AND WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREAT AND HARD-WORKING SPECIAL AGENT.  NOW, IN MY VIEWPOINT...IT IS THEIR LOSS.

I HAVE TO SAY, THOUGH, BEING A LAW STUDENT, I REALLY FEEL LIKE FILING A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FBI FOR VIOLATING MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS.  IN FACT...NO KIDDING...I JUST MIGHT.  THE ENTIRE PROCESS IS EGREGIOUS AND IT IMPINGES ON FUNDAMENTAL PRIVACY RIGHTS THAT SHOULD BE ENJOYED BY EVERY AMERICAN (WHILE NOTING THAT THE WORD 'PRIVACY' IS NO WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION).

REGARDLESS, I AGREE WITH YOU AND THINK THE ENTIRE PROCESS IS A SHAM.  IN THE WORDS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON....THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO SACRIFICE FREEDOM FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER.  THE FBI SCREENING PROCESS IS AGAINST EVERYTHING I BELIEVE IN AND I WOULD RATHER BE CAUGHT DEAD THAN WORK FOR AN AGENCY THAT EMPLOYS SUCH DECEITFUL TACTICS.

OMG!

Quote from: 5F515657380 on Apr 01, 2005, 03:53 AM
QuoteHe wanted to dictate the statement and basically wanted me to admit to using countermeasures, then he would schedule me for a retest.
From the tone of your post, it appears that you wisely did not fall for this ploy. When a polygraph operator requests that you make a written statement (especially one worded like you described), it's not because he feels that things are inconclusive and he wants you to continue in the process with another operator.

Instead, it is overwhelming likely that the examiner is planning to make a written report to disqualify you (for either deception or an arbitrary determination that you employed countermeasures). He is looking for a written confession to help solidify his case. You were smart not to give him one.

Nothing good that can come from making a written admission once a polygraph session has begun. NOTHING.

This is one of the most important pieces of advice that anyone facing a polygraph should know. Failing a polygraph "test" is extremely negative for one's career potential in law enforcement. Still, having a failed polygraph on your record pales in comparison to having a folder sitting in FBI HQ file drawer with a signed statement from an FBI Special Agent stating that you admitted to him that you attempted to beat the pre-employment screening polygraph. Worse yet is when the above sheet of paper is immediately followed by a note in your handwriting admitting to the above.

It is our experience that applicants who fall for the polygrapher's "I am here to help you get hired act—it is you and I against 'headquarters'..." will sign almost anything after a reassuring statement informing the applicant that this is in his best interests. Regrettably, those who go along with this act are often caused irreparable damage.

This is exactly what happened to me and now I want to join the military but I don't know how it will affect me.  Please help.

Just an accountant

I wouldn't worry about it affecting your military service, if someone makes an accusation of "LIAR!" against you and it's only substantiated by some squiggles on paper and a polygrapher's "expert opinion", it's just that, an unsubstantiated accusation.  It just sounds much more freightening because it's coming from the FBI.

With that said, if you work in one of the military's intel units, it might, and I emphasize "might", be an issue.  There are units within the military, like JAG, that expressly prohibit the use of the poly against its members.  It's ultimately the Background that's the most important thing.

Besides, IMHO this polygraph fooey won't be around another 10 years from now anyway, at least as far as the Fed is concerned.  Besides being voodoo crap, some lawsuit I'm sure will be successful to knock it off.

Drew Richardson

Just an accountant,

You write in part:

Quote...Besides, IMHO this polygraph fooey won't be around another 10 years from now anyway, at least as far as the Fed is concerned.  Besides being voodoo crap, some lawsuit I'm sure will be successful to knock it off....

Unfortunately, the fact that lie detection, as we know it, should rightfully have ended roughly a century ago as it began, is no real evidence of its likely demise in the next decade.  But I'm willing to play the role of eternal optimist with you...

pailryder



Dr Richardson

We don't see much information on this site about the century of scientific research into technologies to replace polygraph.  Could you enlighten us?
No good social purpose can be served by inventing ways of beating the lie detector or deceiving polygraphers.   David Thoreson Lykken

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview