- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Recent posts
#31
Intelligence Agency Applications, Hiring, and Employment / Re: 8-hour CI poly, is it norm...
Last post by grim reaper - Dec 30, 2025, 07:35 PMQuotea suspicion of what?Is quickfix DEAD?
#32
Polygraph Policy / Re: DIA's Insider Threat Progr...
Last post by John M. - Dec 30, 2025, 11:59 AMYou may access the Petition and Appendix on the Court's website here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-737.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-737.html
#33
Intelligence Agency Applications, Hiring, and Employment / Re: 8-hour CI poly, is it norm...
Last post by Guest - Dec 29, 2025, 08:47 AMa suspicion of what?
#34
Intelligence Agency Applications, Hiring, and Employment / Re: 8-hour CI poly, is it norm...
Last post by Me2 - Dec 28, 2025, 10:20 AMAny posts from quickfix lately? I have a suspicion...
#35
Intelligence Agency Applications, Hiring, and Employment / Re: 8-hour CI poly, is it norm...
Last post by old chap 1776 - Dec 24, 2025, 05:13 PMI am the OP. I still don't know if I passed that poly that I took a year ago. The IC did finish my background check and I've been sitting in adjudication for about ten months. I was harshly interrogated but I didn't budge. It is a good thing I didn't confess to all those foreign whores I smashed. Does this mean I passed?
I would like to say something else. I am starting to think the IC has relaxed a bit on guys who they know like to travel and have sex with foreign women. Quite frankly, you don't have to report these women if it is a one night stand. Even if you hook up a few times while abroad, I don't think the IC cares so much as long as you aren't keeping contact with them when you get home to the U.S. and aren't sending them money. I think marrying a Russian woman is a security risk. Banging a few whores in some third world country is not so much, just don't admit to prostitution.
I would like to say something else. I am starting to think the IC has relaxed a bit on guys who they know like to travel and have sex with foreign women. Quite frankly, you don't have to report these women if it is a one night stand. Even if you hook up a few times while abroad, I don't think the IC cares so much as long as you aren't keeping contact with them when you get home to the U.S. and aren't sending them money. I think marrying a Russian woman is a security risk. Banging a few whores in some third world country is not so much, just don't admit to prostitution.
#36
Polygraph Policy / Re: DIA's Insider Threat Progr...
Last post by John M. - Dec 22, 2025, 03:05 PMToday, my petition for a writ of certiorari was docketed in the US Supreme Court. #25-737.
I'm representing myself, and I'm hoping that anyone with relevant expertise — psychologists, researchers, clinicians, attorneys, or scholars — might consider whether these issues warrant independent amicus (friend-of-the-court) support. Any such involvement would be entirely voluntary and independent, and focused on the broader legal and scientific issues rather than my personal situation.
The Questions Presented are:
1. Whether a federal agency may, consistent with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and EEOC regulations, redefine a security screening requirement—such as a counterintelligence scope polygraph (CSP) examination—as an "essential job function," thereby eliminating the duty to provide reasonable accommodation to employees whose documented medical conditions render them unsuitable for such testing.
2. Whether mandatory Department of Defense regulations, including DoDI 5210.91—which (a) prohibit adverse administrative action based solely on an unresolved polygraph result and (b) require medical deferral or exemption for individuals who are psychologically or medically unsuited for testing—are judicially enforceable under the Rehabilitation Act, or instead may be disregarded under a theory of unreviewable "security discretion." (App. F)
3. Whether courts may extend Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988), beyond clearance adjudications to cover ordinary personnel and medical accommodation decisions, effectively placing federal employees' statutory rights outside judicial review even when no security clearance has been suspended, revoked, or unfavorably adjudicated.
4. Whether an agency that categorically refuses to consider disability-based accommodations or to engage in the interactive process required by 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(o)(3) may nevertheless be deemed to have acted lawfully under the Rehabilitation Act when its justifications are shifting, medically unsupported, and contrary to its own binding regulations.
If you're interested, or would like more information, I am also available on Signal at sammorter.11
I'm representing myself, and I'm hoping that anyone with relevant expertise — psychologists, researchers, clinicians, attorneys, or scholars — might consider whether these issues warrant independent amicus (friend-of-the-court) support. Any such involvement would be entirely voluntary and independent, and focused on the broader legal and scientific issues rather than my personal situation.
The Questions Presented are:
1. Whether a federal agency may, consistent with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and EEOC regulations, redefine a security screening requirement—such as a counterintelligence scope polygraph (CSP) examination—as an "essential job function," thereby eliminating the duty to provide reasonable accommodation to employees whose documented medical conditions render them unsuitable for such testing.
2. Whether mandatory Department of Defense regulations, including DoDI 5210.91—which (a) prohibit adverse administrative action based solely on an unresolved polygraph result and (b) require medical deferral or exemption for individuals who are psychologically or medically unsuited for testing—are judicially enforceable under the Rehabilitation Act, or instead may be disregarded under a theory of unreviewable "security discretion." (App. F)
3. Whether courts may extend Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988), beyond clearance adjudications to cover ordinary personnel and medical accommodation decisions, effectively placing federal employees' statutory rights outside judicial review even when no security clearance has been suspended, revoked, or unfavorably adjudicated.
4. Whether an agency that categorically refuses to consider disability-based accommodations or to engage in the interactive process required by 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(o)(3) may nevertheless be deemed to have acted lawfully under the Rehabilitation Act when its justifications are shifting, medically unsupported, and contrary to its own binding regulations.
If you're interested, or would like more information, I am also available on Signal at sammorter.11
#37
Share Your Polygraph or CVSA Experience / Re: I am guilty but passed. He...
Last post by Anthony R - Dec 14, 2025, 02:59 PMI "failed" the CVSA and was 100% honest. Granted, I am a high-strung individual who has been on high blood pressure meds off and on over the years. The piece of shit that gave me the CVSA kept trying to get me to admit to a crime I did not commit, and he claimed the CVSA was nearly 100% accurate. While conducting research, I came across the Brian Ross interview with Charles Humble on YouTube. When I saw the interview, I thought Charles Humble had to be the dumbest cock sucker in existence. Anyway, shot that over to my lawyer, who sent it to opposing counsel. They dropped the CVSA argument in a New York minute.
#38
Share Your Polygraph or CVSA Experience / Re: I am guilty but passed. He...
Last post by passed359784 - Dec 14, 2025, 10:40 AMI passed my poly too, WITHOUT USING COUNTERMEASURES, and I lied my ass off.
I know I passed because I was granted my clearance and have been working in a SCIF with classified info for the past year.
How did I pass without using CMs? Easy, I just didn't make a confession, and I remained calm throughout the whole interrogation, which is all the poly is. I knew they would accuse me of lying and withholding info about some crime. This is standard polygraph procedure so I just relaxed and thought about lying on a beach the whole time. Yes, I've committed many crimes, including cheating my taxes for the past several years. I did not tell the polygrapher anything. Result: PASS!
Folks, no need to try to use CMs and possibly screw up, just don't admit to anything. If you can survive the harsh interrogation for several hours, you'll be fine. It is more of a mental endurance than a lie detector.
I know I passed because I was granted my clearance and have been working in a SCIF with classified info for the past year.
How did I pass without using CMs? Easy, I just didn't make a confession, and I remained calm throughout the whole interrogation, which is all the poly is. I knew they would accuse me of lying and withholding info about some crime. This is standard polygraph procedure so I just relaxed and thought about lying on a beach the whole time. Yes, I've committed many crimes, including cheating my taxes for the past several years. I did not tell the polygrapher anything. Result: PASS!
Folks, no need to try to use CMs and possibly screw up, just don't admit to anything. If you can survive the harsh interrogation for several hours, you'll be fine. It is more of a mental endurance than a lie detector.
#39
Action Alerts and Announcements / Re: Twenty-five Years Online
Last post by George W. Maschke - Dec 13, 2025, 07:10 PMlong time lurker,
It's certainly true that this forum is not very active. It's ranking on major search engines, including Google, has also fallen sharply.
However, it continues to provide a wealth of information, and I see no benefit to taking it offline.
It's certainly true that this forum is not very active. It's ranking on major search engines, including Google, has also fallen sharply.
However, it continues to provide a wealth of information, and I see no benefit to taking it offline.
#40
Action Alerts and Announcements / Re: Twenty-five Years Online
Last post by Anthony R - Dec 11, 2025, 12:27 PMI think George deserves kudos for running this site, holding a professional position, plus having a family. I've only done two of the three and that grinded me down to a nub. This is a very important site since so-called lie detectors are an extra-judicial means to quash the civil rights of citizens. If the CVSA and polygraph examiners had their way, they would replace our justice system with their pseudo-science devices.