AntiPolygraph.org Message Board

Update: In a plea agreement dated 12 September 2014, Polk County, Florida prosecutors dropped all sexual assault and possession of child pornography charges against against William McCallister, who had spent more than two years in pre-trial confinement. McCallister pleaded guilty to one count each of of attempted possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, delivery of alprazolam (a drug used to treat anxiety disorders), and interception of a wire/electronic communication, and was placed on probation.


William McCallister (http://floridapolygraphassociates.com/officers.htm), a Florida polygraph operator specializing in "fidelity testing" and screening of convicted sex offenders, has himself been charged with criminal assault (http://www.theledger.com/article/20111215/NEWS/111219559/1410?Title=Polygraph-Examiner-Charged-With-Sexual-Assault). The Smoking Gun has the lowdown, including the police report:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/polygrapher-drugs-gropes-female-client-657312

In 1985, McCallister was fired by the Polk County, Florida Sheriff's Office amidst allegations of sexual harassment:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1346&dat=19860829&id=3bEwAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ZPsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6892,5654346

And in 1993, McCallister was sentenced to 20 years in prison for drugging, kidnapping, and robbing women. He was released in 2000:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/crime/os-former-deputy-accused-rape-20111215,0,4570297.story

McCallister's on-line resume indicates that after his release from prison, he attended the American Polygraph Association's annual seminars in 2004 and 2006, among other polygraph training events.

One wonders what one has to do to get excommunicated from the polygraph community?

As of 16 December 2011, William McCallister's services are advertised (http://www.polygraphplace.com/docs/c-15-s-Florida-examiners.html) on The Polygraph Place. Here is one of six (presumably paid) listings:

(https://antipolygraph.org/graphics/mccallister-polygraphplace.png)

Wow, you couldn't make up stories like this if you tried.

Quote from: George_Maschke on Dec 16, 2011, 01:16 AMOne wonders what one has to do to get excommunicated from the polygraph community? 

Oh George, he was just sowing his wild oats. As long as he's had that 320 hours of training he will forever remain one of the boys.

George,

The man (husband) was being tested for having sex with prostitutes in their garage.  The woman (wife) was being tested for having sexual relations with a fifteen (15) year old male (sexual child abuse).
When I told the woman she could do a gang of time for this type of conduct and DCF could conduct an indepth investigation.  This is the complaint I got, don't figure???

P.S.  The wife told me the husband hit her over the head and punched her in the nose
during a previous fight? When will this come out, I guess at trial!!!

Sincerely,

William L. McCallister
Clinical & Forensic Polygraph Examiner
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
395 E. Central Avenue
Winter Haven, FL 33880

Quote from: William McCallister on Dec 20, 2011, 11:09 PMGeorge,

The man (husband) was being tested for having sex with prostitutes in their garage.  The woman (wife) was being tested for having sexual relations with a fifteen (15) year old male (sexual child abuse).
When I told the woman she could do a gang of time for this type of conduct and DCF could conduct an indepth investigation.  This is the complaint I got, don't figure???

P.S.  The wife told me the husband hit her over the head and punched her in the nose
during a previous fight? When will this come out, I guess at trial!!!

Sincerely,

William L. McCallister
Clinical & Forensic Polygraph Examiner
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
395 E. Central Avenue
Winter Haven, FL 33880

William,

Being falsely accused must be a drag, but I do have a suggestion for you: take a polygraph exam. All you have to do is tell the truth and you'll be just fine, right? And if you're worried about a false positive, try using countermeasures, as I am sure you know that when properly applied, they cannot be detected.

Mr. McCallister,

I looked at your comments and did not see a denial of the accusations, only comments about your reported victim and her  husband.  You may wish to invoke your 5th amendment right to remain silent, which I would suggest. 

To:  Mr. Truth & Bill Brown

In the old days, sexual accusers were asked to submit to polygraph testing to ensure statements were true and accurate.  Now days, thanks to rape shield laws alleged victims only need raise their right hand and swear to anything without fear of reprisal.  False sexual allegations have increased. Law Enforcement needs to conduct more extensive interviews with both parties involved to ensure integrity.  No, I didn't do this.  Give me the test.
William McCallister 

Exerts from a news article regarding your past experiences and reputation.  There appears to be a pattern here.  I believe the justice system will make a fair and impartial decision regarding your current situation.    And I'm sure polygraph will not be part of the process in your case. 

Following his 1992 arrest in Orlando, the Statewide Prosecutor's Office charged him with 34 felony counts of kidnapping, robbery, fraudulent use of credit cards and slipping a knock-out drug into his victims' drinks. A plea bargain spared McCallister from a potential life sentence without parole if he had been convicted at trial.
In 1993, McCallister was sentenced to 20 years in prison for drugging up to a dozen women with temazepam,  The state Department of Corrections website shows McCallister was released in 2000.   McCallister had been fired by the Leon County Sheriff in 1979 for sexual comments to teenage girls and the Polk County Sheriff's Office fired him as its polygraph examiner in 1985 after female employees complained about his behavior.

To: Bill Brown

Details for Case No: 86-001480
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
Judge:  K. N. AYERS
 
Petitioner:  DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING
vs.   
Respondent:  WILLIAM L. MCCALLISTER
 
Date Filed:  5/2/1986
Date Assigned:  5/6/1986
Last Docket Entry:   
 
Location:  Bartow, Florida
District:  Middle
Agency:  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Division:  Division of Licensing
 
Agency Action:  ADOPTED IN TOTO
  Agency Final Order on 3/20/1987.
 
Status:  Closed
Recommended Order on  Monday, November 03, 1986. 
 
Summary:  Evidence failed to prove misconduct by respondent.

William McCallister

To: Bill Brown

To:  Bill Brown

Please take the time to read these documents. I am not guilty of everything you hear about me.

This is what happens when you stand up to a crooked Sheriff who was given a presentment by a grand jury with a recomendation to resign. I had to appear before this Grand Jury.  The Sheriff was a former Klan Member, Don't figure why I got fired. There is nothing more deceptive than the Truth.

William McCallister

Quote from: William McCallister on Dec 24, 2011, 03:33 AMTo:  Bill Brown

Please take the time to read these documents. I am not guilty of everything you hear about me.

I am sure you are not guilty of everything.  However your prior Felony conviction and current allegations are similar in nature.  Your statement "There is nothing more deceptive than the Truth." is interesting and a similar statement is mentioned in a book about sociopaths.  Also Shakespeare uses a similar statement. 

I am sure the courts will sort out the truth, and justice will prevail. 

To: Bill Brown

Which book?  I would like to read it?

William

To: Bill Brown

Are you calling Shakespeare a sociopath???

William McCallister

To: Bill Brown:

"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

William McCallsiter

To: Bill Brown & Winter Haven PD

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes

George, thanks for allowing me to sound off on your website.

William McCallister

ATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

I cant speak on William's behalf but I can tell you that I am a friend of his.  When I lived in Florida a few years ago there were a whole group of friends who I used to ride and hang out with almost every Thursday night and one day on the weekends.  William was one of them.  I never felt he was any different than the other men but I will say...he was always a gentleman.  He never hid who he was or anything about his past.  I NEVER saw him drop anything into anyone's drink and I NEVER saw him do anything inappropriate. He was always kind and always willing to help his friends.  The picture you are painting of him here is horrible.  If you did do something wrong William than shame on you!!  but....I don't believe you did nor do I believe you would ever do any harm to anyone.  Maybe the rest of you need to spend some time with the man before you judge him.  He has a heart of gold and I will always consider him to be a great friend.  And.....NO...we never had any relationship more than friends in case any of you are interested.  Good luck to you William...please don't forget you do have friends and we all love ya!!  Keep your chin up and don't worry what people say....you know the truth.  "The truth will set you free".   :)

Interesting to see Mr. McCallister squirming like a snail in salt. However, sir, you did accept the plea bargain, therefore you must have done it, yes? I was forced into a similar situation, and accepted the lesser sentence on a false accusation. No one believes me, either, and now I must take "maintenance polygraphs" to insure the public is safe from the fiendish impulses of a degenerate sex offender. I've already seen a poly examiner lie about me capriciously on at least 2 occasions. You need to find a new occupation.

Now I understand whay several single young ladies (I tested in my Tampa office)  thought it was strange that you were willing to drive over a hundred miles and give them housecalls without asking for any prepayment!!!   

Reminds me of an episode of To Catch A Predator....you are going away fro a long time you weasel....For you to continue being a Polygraph Examiner would be as dangerous as a pedofile opreating a child care facility. >:(

abusedbygov,

You described your crime in an earlier post and admitted to it.  Your plea bargain was to escape incarceration and it was based on your admissions and actions.  Mr. McCallister also admitted to his previous conviction and has not hidden it from "Sandra", according to her post in support of him.  That was also a valid conviction for which he served time.  Is he guilty of the current allegations?  Only he and the ones accusing him know for sure.  We will find out when there is a trial or plea bargain, and I am willing to accept the judgment of the court or his admission at a plea bargain.  I believe things look very bad for him at this time, however, I'm not privy to all of the facts in his current case.  I cannot make a judgment based on the information I currently am aware of. 

QuoteFor you to continue being a Polygraph Examiner would be as dangerous as a pedofile opreating a child care facility. 

Somehow, I don't think I would feel much better having you opreating the instrument.

To: Tampa Polygraph Examiner

Why don't you give your name??? You must be one of the many poorly trained and incompetent examiners operating throughout the State of Florida.  People use my service because of my knowledge, skills and experience. It is one thing to make an accusation, but another to prove it. 

There is an examiner, you know who you are, that I sued back in 1986 for being incompetent.  I suspect this comment came from you. As much as it pains me to say this...the AntiPolygraph community is understandably right about their complaints with the polygraph profession.  I have been on both sides, therefore, I have first hand knowledge.  It is easy to make a rush to judgement, so until you have all the case facts and information regarding a specific allegation or situation, it is best to be reserved.

William McCallister

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Jan 06, 2012, 07:00 PMYou described your crime in an earlier post and admitted to it.Your plea bargain was to escape incarceration and it was based on your admissions and actions.

Huh? What? I don't know what you're smokin, kid, but it must be really good. You got the wrong info. I didn't "admit" to anything on this website, because I didn't do anything. I didn't escape incarceration my friend, I was a guest of the lovely government for quite a few years. If I had not pled guilty, I could have gotten many many many more years, for nothing. The only thing I recall "admitting" to was that the system is set up in such a way as to virtually insure a guilty verdict, should one choose to go to trial.

Abusedbygov,

This was your second post on this board.  I don't know your true age and I am sure you do not know my true age.  Thanks for the compliment "what are you smoking Kid". 

Oh yes indeedy, my perspicacious friend. Only, in my case, it went a whole lot deeper. It was the owner of perverted-justice.com, NOT a cop, just a wild-eyed fanatical Jesus loving GAWD fearing jizzbone. I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, and THEY knew I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, yet they tracked me down and boom! That was it.

My reading of your post indicates a sexual conversation with a person posing as a 13 year old, that was a crime and you were convicted by plea bargain, which means you admitted to the allegations and charges.  You served your time and I do hope you moved on in your life and no longer speak with persons posing as 13 years olds, regardless of their true age. 

Best of luck to you in your future endeavors 

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Jan 07, 2012, 07:17 PMOh yes indeedy, my perspicacious friend. Only, in my case, it went a whole lot deeper. It was the owner of perverted-justice.com, NOT a cop, just a wild-eyed fanatical Jesus loving GAWD fearing jizzbone. I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, and THEY knew I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, yet they tracked me down and boom! That was it.

My reading of your post indicates a sexual conversation with a person posing as a 13 year old, that was a crime 

Ahh, yes, now I see. It all becomes clear. My "admission" was there was a conversation with an adult posing as a 13 yr old. You consider this some sort of a crime. Hmm. What if I told you my real age was.....12? You discussed sex!! Oh My God!! You've committed a crime! Oh Puhleeze. I don't know how old you are, but grow up.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 117 > § 2422
§ 2422. COERCION AND ENTICEMENT
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.

abusedbygov,

A plea is a person's formal response to a criminal charge.  If you enter a guilty plea, it means that you admit you committed the crime with which you've been charged.  The judge then asks "Are you pleading guilty because in fact you are guilty?" or words to that effect.  You must answer; "Yes", or the guilty plea is not accepted by the court and a trial is set. 

  I didn't make the laws.   There are appellate court decisions that allow conviction when any party is posing as a 13 year old and you are an adult.  Just for the record, I am considered a "Senior" by my younger associates. 

Bill,

Where in this language does it allow for prosecution if there was no real victim? Most 13 year olds have the common sense to not run off and meet a stranger; those that would, are on the edge of the Bell Curve and would most likely fall victim to any nefarious scenario. All the drama about sex crimes aside, this seems to cross the line into entrapment.

In the statute it does not address the issue of an adult posing as a child.  The appellate courts upheld convictions on cases where adults posed as young children and the individuals talking to them believed the adult was a child. 

"persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual" to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so"

I believe that is the part of the statute used in the decisions.  The Supreme Court has also upheld the appellate court decisions.  The courts have held that this is not entrapment.  There are several organizations, one mentioned by abusedbygov that goes after these cases. 

The court decisions have allowed this practice and do not find it to be entrapment.  The persons posing as underage children do not encourage the person they are talking with to violate any laws.  All conversations are saved on the computer for use in court with no omissions of wording. 

McCallister, cops charge, then told the woman how she could remedy her purported problem. "If you give me a blow job," he said, "then I will tell your husband that you passed." Recalling that she was becoming dizzy and faint, the woman said that McCallister warned that her spouse would divorce her if he found out she failed the polygraph test.
At this point, McCallister reached inside the woman's shirt and began fondling her breasts. He then "reached his hand down in front of her and rubbed her vagina on the outside of her pants." While he was groping, McCallister asked the woman a series of questions about her sex life and masturbation.

She told police that she became nervous when McCallister locked the door and lowered the lights. That's when McCallister offered her a "green-blue pill, which he took from a prescription bottle," cops reported.

The woman ingested the pill as instructed by McCallister, who she referred to as a "doctor" in a police interview. "The victim believed that Mr. McCallister had the authority to administer medications," according to the affidavit sworn by a Winter Haven Police Department detective.

As he moved his chair closer to the woman, McCallister allegedly told her that they had a "major problem" since she had shown deception in answers to the three questions he had asked her. "The victim told him that cannot be right because she told the truth," the affidavit notes.

>:(

Stefano, 

I did a little research and found the following:

Five of the appeals, including one government appeal, were argued on the grounds that an actual minor, not an undercover law enforcement officer portraying a minor, was necessary for a conviction under the statute. The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 2422 did not require that the intended victim be an actual minor as long as the defendant believed he was communicating with a minor.

Thanks for that insight Bill. I guess it's similar to when they nab these home grown jihadists after purchasing explosives/weapons from an undercover agent. I can understand it objectively, but it still bothers me.

At what point would you have left the room?

Sounds like confabulation.

To: Wade Moss, vice president, Florida Polygraph Association

On many occassions you have denied that I filed a suit against you in 1987 for Incompetence.  Well here is the legal site, so check it out.  Polk County, Florida, Clerk of the Court, Bartow, Florida. 33830

WILLIAM L. McCALLISTER,
                          Plaintiff,


vs.                                        Case No.  GCG-87-3098


ARGENBRIGHT & ASSOCIATES,
INC.,        a Florida corporation,
and WADE B. MOSS,

                         Defendants,

This was settled out of court because you could not defend against the merits of the case.

And, you are one of the high mucky mucks of the Florida Polygraph Association.  Where were they when the public needed protecting from improperly trained and incompetent polygraph examiners like yourself.  You are very impotent.

William L. McCallister

Quote from: William McCallister on Dec 24, 2011, 03:33 AMThis is what happens when you stand up to a crooked Sheriff...

Would that be the Leon County Sheriff in 1979, the Polk County Sheriff in 1985, or the Orange County Sheriff in 1992?

-Aunty Agony.

Polk County Sheriff Dan Daniels 1985.

William McCallister

Stefano,

It bothers me also, we have gone a long way in giving up our rights as citizens.  This particular issue makes sense to me and I can see the purpose of the decisions.  I just hope we don't go too far and create a super secret manner of enforcing laws.

I don't want my rights infringed upon in any way, however, I do see it coming if we continue on this course of action. 

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Jan 10, 2012, 02:28 PMThe court held that 18 U.S.C. § 2422 did not require that the intended victim be an actual minor as long as the defendant believed he was communicating with a minor. 

I am possessed of a grand ennui *sigh*. "As long as the defendant BELIEVED he was communicating with a minor", you say.  You know nothing of my case, but I had told the so-called 'minor' that I knew he/she was a member of Perverted-Justice.com and that I would bring them down for attacking me publicly for merely disagreeing with them. My email accounts were hacked and shut down by Xavier Von Erck, the owner of P-J. My home phone number was given out, my address published, all LONG BEFORE the event that caused my incarceration took place. I acted in self defense, and the result was near annihilation. And yes, Stefano & Mr. Brown, it SHOULD bother you, and more! We have already gone far far beyond Orwell in persecuting and prosecuting "thought crime". Your rights have already been infringed on-- Hell, they've been stomped into fucking oblivion!!!

Ennui is common among those who have fought the polygraph battle. I can see you are very angry...

It makes me wonder if those folks behind "perverted justice" and "to catch a predator" have given much thought to the future; just as they will be getting old and frail and ready to enjoy retirement, all those whom they helped lock up will be paroled after decades of festering thirst for revenge. That's not the kind of retirement I'd want.

abusedbygov,

All I know about your case is what you have published on this board.  I have not convicted you or accused you of anything.  Your conviction was your decision to plea rather than fight.  If you are innocent, I have sympathy for your plight.  I have questions in my mind regarding several issues you have mentioned, and I have not enquired into your private matters, only responded to your public statements.  If you were offended by my posts, i do offer my apologies.  I don't retract what i have posted, it is my honest opinion to which I am entitled. 

Again, I do wish you good luck in your future and hope you find happiness and contentment.  Anger is a destructive force if not released appropriately, even more damaging if internalized and allowed to suppurate.

ov

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Jan 12, 2012, 11:20 PMIf you were offended by my posts, i do offer my apologies.

No apology necessary. I think I am more frustrated than anything. There is no recourse against the unrestrained juggernaut that is the oxymoron known as The Federal Criminal Justice System. I truly was abused by the government, and they know it and do not give a shit. Even the Judge, at sentencing, had some kinder words for my plight than one would expect he would give some deviant pedophile sex offender. There was nothing I could do. 96 out of 100 people arrested by the Feds take a plea. Of those who do not, only 1 in 10 is exonerated. (Well, 'exonerated' may be too strong a word. They are found 'not guilty,' but the odor of their arrest lingers on.) That means the federal 'justice' system has a 99.6% conviction rate. I believe Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and the Inquisition are the only others in that percentage range. god bless america.

abusedbygov,

You may be interested in a current case argued before the Supreme Court Today.  FCC and Free Speech issues, this may be a landmark case and could answer the problems with cases such as yours. 

Mr. Brown: Regarding your post:


"You may be interested in a current case argued before the Supreme Court Today.  FCC and Free Speech issues, this may be a landmark case and could answer the problems with cases such as yours. "

How so? My understanding of this ruling is that it impacts FCC broadcast censorship. If it could be applied to cases such as mine, I'm all for it!! I just don't see the tie in. Please elucidate.

To: Antipolygraph Community:

In 1985, I was fired by Sheriff Dan Daniels, Polk County Sheriff's Office, Bartow, Florida 33830. I was accused of illegal and inappropriate behavior during the administration of pre-employment polygraph examinations given to potential employees, before hiring.

My firing came on the third day of front page, Lakeland Ledger Newspaper investigations/articles, reporting Sheriff Daniel's improper and illegal hiring practices. The Sheriff was hiring police officers whom were current Ku Klux Klan members. He was also hiring persons whom had committed serious crimes and used drugs, excessively, but were promised jobs during his election campaign.  This information was developed and documented during the interview and testing process.

I know this to be true because I was running the Sheriff's polygraph unit.  The State Attorney, Jerry Hill took these concerns and allegations to a Polk County, Florida, Grand Jury.  A presentment was subsequently issued recommending the Sheriff resign from office, and he did so. 

Regarding the hiring of Ku klux Klan members, the Sheriff had the Lakeland Police Department Polygraph Examiner, Tim Redmond, re-test.  Guess what! Both former Lakeland Police Department sergeants passed with flying colors and were hired despite polygraph findings. Don't figure!  Later, I was told they passed because Redmond failed to ask that specific question. OK!

I guess you can see where all of this is going...Next, three women all make serious accusations, eight months, after their pre-employment polygraph tests. This just happened to surface on the third day of the Ledger Newspaper articles about Sheriff Daniels.  All three complained on the same day.

One said I fondled her breasts. Another said I asked her if she and her husband had anal sex. And the third said I falsified her cocaine usage on the polygraph report given the Sheriff.

Now comes the Good Stuff!!!

I am asked to submit to polygraph testing in order to clear myself of the accusations lodged against me. Now, I have an internal affairs investigation and my Florida State Polygraph Examiners license has been suspended pending a formal hearing with the Division of Administrative Hearings (see attached file).

The state sent a licensing investigator to my private office in Bartow, Florida for an interview regarding the complaints against me.  While at my office the investigator looked through my files, pulled several case files and charts from file cabinets.

He stretched several charts out on the desk, this is prior to computerized polygraph systems; he looked rather puzzled as he observed them.  At this point, I asked investigator if he knew what he was looking at.  He said "No but I would like to go to polygraph school someday."

My thought was how can the State of Florida properly supervise polygraph examiners or Detection of Deception Examiners if their field personnel do not have the necessary education and training.  The State had suspended my license and it cost me $34,000.00 to hire a Tallahassee law firm that specialized in administrative law.  Eight months later I won the hearing, regarding the women's complaints at the Sheriff's Office, and my license was re-instated.

Now lets address the polygraph examinations I took. First I went to a firm called Les Levy & Associates, Orlando, FL, they were connected with Graymark Security, Miami, Florida.  They reported me as deceptive.  I protested the findings and asked for a re-test. I was denied and deception was reported to Sheriff Daniels. The charts disappeared. Later I found out they wanted the Polk County Sheriff's business.

Next, I went to Argenbright & Associates, specifically Wade Moss, Tampa, Florida.  Wade Moss stated that my results were inconclusive, but he reported deception to Sheriff Daniels and falsely reported deception to the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings. This is the same Wade Moss who owns Asset Guardian, Inc., 2706 U.S Alt 19 N., Suite 254, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683.  This is also the same Wade Moss whom is the vice president/private of the Florida Polygraph Association.  I wonder if they know this. Beware of this character. Those charts also disappeared.

When my lawsuit (see attached file) was filed, several subpoenas were issued to obtain records of the examinations (cover sheet, charts, etc.).  Guess what? The charts were nowhere to be found. They disappeared. Don't Figure? I settled both suits out of court for $10,000.00 each.  It wasn't about making money, it was about making a point. Those incompetent examiners complicated the investigation process.

Since that time the news media and public in general still believe I sexually harassed females at the Sheriff's Office, I did not.  The record speaks for itself.  I am more than willing to admit to things I did, but will not admit to things I did not do.  Please read the attached official documents.

As I have stated in the past, I have been on both sides of the fence. I know the polygraph profession needs to be more closely supervised.  The examiners need more advanced training and experience.  I can state equivocally that I have never treated anyone the way I was treated by my own profession.

I have also posted a picture of Wade Moss so you positively identify and avoid him.  I understand why the public, in general, is aggravated and suspicious of the polygraph profession.

Thank you for letting me post this information.

William McCallister
Senior Examiner
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
395 E. Central Avenue
Winter Haven, FL 33880
Ph: 863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

To: Polygraph Community

Additional supporting files/Administrative Hearing

William McCallister

To: Antipolygraph Community

Additional files/picture of Wade Moss

William McCallister

To: AntiPolygraph Community

Last paragraph, please correct equivocally to read unequivocally. Sorry about the error.

William McCallister

Quote:
"I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." Fritz Perls

abusedbygov,

Not sure if it will apply.  It is contingent on the wording the Supreme court uses in its decision if it is favorable on the side of the broadcasting industry.  "IF" the court determines that obscenity in broadcasting is Free Speech and does not impinge on or violate the obsenity laws, then it could be argued that individuals have the same rights to use sexual language when communicating with underage persons.  Some of the arugments in this case involve subjecting persons under the age of 18 to obscene language and statements. 

All of this is speculation and conjecture.  My legal advisor is watching this case carefully and informs me that only "Child Porn" pictures would be illegal, conversations would not be illegal if the Supreme Court rules in favor of the broadcast industry.  It will be interesting to see what happens and how it impacts all of us. 

I personally hope the court rules that broadcasting obscene language remains a violation, this is only a personal opinion.  (I don't want my grandchildren subjected to it.)  Others have differing opinions.  As you may have guessed, I am a Right Wing Extremest with opinions not consistent with many on this board.  I do have respect for divergent opinions. 

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Jan 15, 2012, 01:33 PMI am a Right Wing Extremest 

That's not my impression.

Stefano,

OK, not extremest, just decline to being conservative, with a midget liberal in there somewhere.   :) :question

To: Antipolygraph Community

End to Sheriff Dan Daniel's Career

William McCallister

After the polygraph was issued, McCallister asked the husband to leave, and went back to the examination room.  He locked the door and dimmed the lights.  He offered the woman a pill, telling the victim it would 'calm her down.'

The victim believed McCallister had the authority to administer the medication and took the pill as instructed.

McCallister then told her that she did not pass the polygraph test, but that he would tell the victim's husband that she passed the test if she would perform sexual favors on him.

The police report says the victim began to feel dizzy and faint. McCallister continued to tell the victim to calm down and started massaging her in a rough manner. The victim requested her husband, but McCallister continued to touch her, "ultimately fondling her breasts and in her groin area. During this, McCallister was asking explicit questions regarding her sex life. The victim continued to ask for her husband all the while feeling dizzy and faint."

 :DTo: PoligrafoenMiami

Sounds like one of my competitors. How sophamoric!
You little megalomaniac!

William McCallister

The arrest affidavit reveals that McCallister was named as a suspect in a remarkably similar case in 2007. In that matter, a woman alleged that McCallister "excessively brushed against" her breasts during a polygraph examination. The woman--whose husband had been polygraphed before her--told investigators that McCallister sought oral sex and "delved into questions of infidelity and specifically questions involving her giving oral sex to other men." When McCallister took a can of Coke from the woman, she became afraid that "he was attempting to put something in her drink."

McCallister, who was not charged in connection with the 2007 incident, is locked up in the Polk County Jail on the three new felony charges.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, continuously  :-*asks for blowjobs from desperate women over the years.....

To: sophomoricmegalomanicster

Lets start with that remarkable similar case in 2007.  Sounds like something like this occured.  The husband brings his wife into the office because he suspects her of being a slut and a whore.

He doesn't believe her one bit; he also doesn't trust her one bit.  He suspects her of having sex with someone other than himself.  That's why he wants me to test her. Lots of drama!

Obviously, they have huge trust issues regarding marital sex.  Specifically, he wants me to find out if she is having physical sexual contact with someone other than himself.  This includes oral, anal and/or vaginal types of physical contact with either friends, neighbors, co-workers, hell might even be the whole football team, etc.....

Once inside the polygraph lab she states to me that her husband is a real jealous asshole. In fact, he doesnt even trust me to be in here with you.  That's how jealous he is. Right now, he probable thinks that I am giving you a blow job to pass this test.

At this point I would probable look straight at her and state  "Would you really offer to give me a blow job to pass this test?" Then she would probably say "no of course not."  Then I would say "All you have to do is tell the truth and the test will take care of itself."

Anyone who has administered polygraph tests for any length of time knows that this type of language goes on during infidelity type testing.  You can't Mickey Mouse around with the questions or their exact meanings.  Adult language is necessary, present and expected. There should be no questions that are ambiguous in nature. So, why are people shocked that strong sexual language is asked of and answered to during the examination process.  Don't figure!!!

Questions of infidelity and specifically questions involving her giving oral sex to other men should certainly be asked if that is the focus of the examnation.  What the hell do you think that lady was in my office for. Admission to the local nunnery???  Get real, you obviously know little about the real polygraph profession.

As far as the coke can.  We do not want people spilling their drinks onto expensive equipment.  She would have been asked to dispose of the drink.  She probable gave me the can and I threw it away.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, continuously; then it must be a professional polygraph examiner doing his or her job.

You must be one of my sophomoric competitors, try again.

William McCallister

Quote from: William McCallister on Jan 15, 2012, 02:21 AMThe record speaks for itself.  I am more than willing to admit to things I did...

Would that be making sexual comments to teenage girls in Leon County in 1979, fondling a female applicant's breasts in Polk County in 1985, questioning a female applicant about anal sex during a pre-employment interview in Polk County in 1985, falsifying a subject's cocaine usage in Polk County in 1985, drugging, kidnapping, and robbing a woman in Orange County in 1992, drugging, kidnapping, and robbing a woman in Seminole County in 1992, drugging, kidnapping, and robbing a woman in Hillsborough County in 1992, drugging, kidnapping, and robbing a woman in Pinellas County in 1992, rubbing against a woman and asking her for oral sex in Polk County in 2007, or drugging, fondling, groping, and demanding oral sex from a woman in Polk County in 2011?

-Aunty Agony.

To: Aunty Agony, That was quite a tautology!!!


The record speaks for itself.  I am more than willing to admit to things I did... BUT NOT THE THINGS I DID NOT!         (you must have inadvertently left that out, right?)

You are acting like a slick-ass Philadelphia liar, i mean lawyer! Must have been a Freudian slip or parapraxis.

I notice a lot of you folks, antipolygraph,  like to use nickel words with a two cent brain.  How do you like that one???

Now let's address the questions at hand:

1.  The teen age girl in Tallahassee, Leon County.  I was a uniform patrol deputy working the morning shift.  I get a call to an appartment complex.  The female manager is upset there are five juveniles in the pool. One lives there, the rest do not.  They are skipping school.  She attempted to have them leave, but they became unruly and bellicose. Can you believe that?  Don't figure!

Well the law arrives and he is asked to remove the non residents from the property.  The teen age, smart ass, girl gets upset that her friends are being thrown off the property.

The deputy gets out his trusty not pad and demands the names and phone numbers from all five teenagers.  He is going to call the school and report their where abouts, also he is also going to call the parents if they don't leave immediately.  They do so, and the calls to school and parents is never made.

The girl must have gone home and complained to her parent(s) that the deputy was personal and asked for her name and number.  This obviously means he is acting inappropriate, must have been sexual, Right?

Nothing sexual was ever said or infered.  I got fired by then Sheriff Ken Katsaris several weeks later for stopping some of his friends and writing traffic tickets.  They told me they knew the Sheriff.  I told them I know the Sheriff, too.  They all got tickets anyway.  Sheriff Katsaris fired me (he didn't like my attitude) and nothing was ever said about sexual comments, Don't figure!

Well, I moved back home and Sheriff Mims gave me a job.  Investigator, Organized Crime and Intelligence Unit, Special Investigations Division, Polk County Sheriff's Office. (1979)
Wow!! I got a promotion and a raise!!!  Don't figure!!!

NOW FOR BOOBS, COCAINE, AND FALSIFICATION...

Sounds like sex, drugs and rock-n-roll or sex, lies and video tapes!!! Take your pick.

Obviously, you haven't read the previously attached files on this issue.  There is even a lawsuit against Wade Moss, Florida Polygraph Association vice president, for he is a very impotent person. Where were they when I needed them.

I was a full member and needed their help. All I got was a bunch of nothing.  I was cleared by the State on these allegations and my polygraph license was re-instated.
Don't figure!!!

As far as the Orange County charges in 1992, I pled guilty and served my time, also probation.

Note:  The Statewide prosecutor wouldn't let me take any depositions.  If I did, then the plea bargin was off.  I didn't, so it never came out that some of the kidnappings were actually dates.

The women who were recently on the news Orlando, live in Deltona. Regarding the alleged kidnapping charge, it was me, my friend, her friend and she. Four of us together on a date.

How do you get charged with kidnapping two women, when two men and two women are out on a date.  Well in Florida, the statewide prosecutor was very creative.  He used the premis that it was by secret?  They didn't even know they were kidnapped.  You can't even make this stuff up, right???

I should have done two years.  I was eligible for early release, but the statewide prosecutor wrote a nasty letter to the parol commission stating that I was suspected of sexually abusing some of the women, even though I was never charged with a sex crime. Even though none of the woman alleged this.  Because of this I did seven years instead of the two I agreed to, for the plea.  Don't figure!!!

If I would have known that the statewide prosecutor was going to play dirty, I would have gone to trial and taken my chances.

I tried to pull by plea, but the judge denied my appeal and I wound up serving seven years. Oh! Did I mention that my defense attorney, Jack Wilkins, Bartow, Florida (while defending me) went before a Grand Jury, Tampa, Florida.  He purjured himself and was sentenced to five years in Federal prison.  Like I said "You can't make this stuff up, Right?"

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes

William McCallister

To: Anitpolygraph Community:

"Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Complete Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

:D"A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get it's boots on?"
―Mark Twain

How do you like these???


William McCallister

QuoteI notice a lot of you folks, antipolygraph,like to use nickel words with a two cent brain.How do you like that one???

Are you suggesting that our lexica are in-congruent with our encephalization?

Just making sure someone is still awake out there, Ok!
Glad to see you are still on the firing line.

"He whom fails to tooteth his own flute may soon come to find his flute untooteth?"

William McCallister

To: Antipolygraph Community

Hey, since I have been on both sides of the fence. Does anyone have any questions good or bad?

I have been a thorn in the side of Florida's most premier polygraph examiners and associations for years. If anyone has been falsely accused or mistreated by a Florida examiner, private or law enforcement, just contact me.

I have been an examiner for twenty-eight years.  If, I know the answer or can direct you to the right person, I will.

Thank you for allowing me to sound off on your website.

William L. McCallister
Senior Examiner
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
395 E. central Avenue
Winter Haven, FL 33880
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

William,

Are you trying to convince yourself or the world of your innocence?  All of your postings are homogenous and focus on your contention of credulity.  You protest too much. 

To: Bill Brown

"The more outré and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined."
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Hound of the Baskervilles

William McCallister

Mr. McCallister,

In 2010, I took my girlfriend to be tested at this guy's office in Winter Haven, FL....i think it was a Merril Lynch building...she had admitted to cheating one time, with one guy....the Examiner spent an hour talking to her about masturbation, her life's sexual history and fantasies, and then offered her some pills....luckily she refused....he then hooked her up to his machine for about 5 minutes then  ended the test and told her she failed.....she began crying...so he began massaging her???.....she demanded the Examiner unlock his office door.........and unlock the main doors outside so I could get back in the building...........oh.....wait......Do you have an office in Winter Haven!!!!!!   

To: John from West Palm Beach

I think I remember this.  This was the case where your girlfriend brought you in for testing.  It seemed like you were caught giving head at the local bus station to an undercover cop.  She wanted to confirm this before getting rid of your ass.

You were in denial, but after a few minutes of intense interrogation, you confessed.  If I remember correctly, you begged for forgiveness and admitted to having sex with a  chihuahua.

When I reported the findings to your girlfriend, you denied the admission and told her you thought I was a priest. 

Now here is the real strange part. The subsequent medical examination of the chihuahua produced no physical evidence this ever occured.  Lucky for you!!!  Don't figure.

William McCallister

Note: In this message thread, the following posts all originate from the same IP address:

Tampa Polygraph Examiner, 06 Jan 2012
Jax Examiner, 10 Jan 2012
Orlando Polygraph Examine, 10 Jan 2012
PoligrafoenMiami, 17 Jan 2012
sophamoricmegalomanicster, 18 Jan 2012
John from West Palm Beach, 21 Jan 2012

To: Administrator

Thank you for posting this information.  If you had not, I am sure Law Enforcement would have taken his/her statements seriously and Déjà Vu All Over Again.

again thanks,

William McCallister

19 Dec 2011Polygraph Examiner Drugged And Groped Female Client During Polygraph Test

William McCallister
A polygraph examiner allegedly drugged a female client during an examination and then fondled her and sought sexual favors as she became disoriented and faint, according to Florida cops.

William McCallister, 58, was arrested yesterday and charged with extortion, attempted sexual battery, and delivery of a controlled substance in connection with the incident last Wednesday at his Winter Haven office.
McCallister, pictured in the mug shot above, is a convicted felon who spent 15 years in prison for robbery, kidnapping, and administering barbiturates. That conviction stemmed from a probe in which he was "suspected of drugging women in the Orlando area," cops noted.

According to an arrest affidavit, the woman and her husband went to McCallister's office so that he could administer polygraph examinations for both of them. While cops do not further detail why the couple sought the lie detector tests, which cost a total of $1,284, it appears that the polygraph examination dealt with marital fidelity.

After her husband's polygraph was completed (and he departed), the woman entered McCallister's office. She told police that she became nervous when McCallister locked the door and lowered the lights. That's when McCallister offered her a "green-blue pill, which he took from a prescription bottle," cops reported.

The woman ingested the pill as instructed by McCallister, who she referred to as a "doctor" in a police interview. "The victim believed that Mr. McCallister had the authority to administer medications," according to the affidavit sworn by a Winter Haven Police Department detective.

As he moved his chair closer to the woman, McCallister allegedly told her that they had a "major problem" since she had shown deception in answers to the three questions he had asked her. "The victim told him that cannot be right because she told the truth," the affidavit notes.

McCallister, cops charge, then told the woman how she could remedy her purported problem. "If you give me a blow job," he said, "then I will tell your husband that you passed." Recalling that she was becoming dizzy and faint, the woman said that McCallister warned that her spouse would divorce her if he found out she failed the polygraph test.

At this point, McCallister reached inside the woman's shirt and began fondling her breasts. He then "reached his hand down in front of her and rubbed her vagina on the outside of her pants." While he was groping, McCallister asked the woman a series of questions about her sex life and masturbation.

The woman said she felt light-headed "and wanted to faint" when her husband came to retrieve her from the office. As the couple was leaving, McCallister handed them their polygraph results, saying, "Don't forget these."

A subsequent hospital test revealed that the woman's urine tested positive for the presence of a sedative. McCallister was arrested after the woman picked out his photo from a police lineup.

The arrest affidavit reveals that McCallister was named as a suspect in a remarkably similar case in 2007. In that matter, a woman alleged that McCallister "excessively brushed against" her breasts during a polygraph examination. The woman--whose husband had been polygraphed before her--told investigators that McCallister sought oral sex and "delved into questions of infidelity and specifically questions involving her giving oral sex to other men." When McCallister took a can of Coke from the woman, she became afraid that "he was attempting to put something in her drink."

McCallister, who was not charged in connection with the 2007 incident, is locked up in the Polk County Jail on the three new felony charges. As seen above, according to his web site, McCallister offers polygraph examinations for a wide variety of topics, including "Relationship & Marital Issues." A lie detector test, McCallister claims, will help a client get to the truth about whether their partner has been unfaithful. Lines of McCallister inquiry include "Intimate Relations," "Use of Escort or Prostitution Services," and "Engaging in Online Cyber Sex or Pornographic Activities."
Posted by Temitope Olayiwola Taiwo at 12/19/2011 01:

Quote from: William McCallister on Jan 20, 2012, 05:01 PMTo: Antipolygraph Community

Hey, since I have been on both sides of the fence. Does anyone have any questions good or bad?

Question: Why are you posting hear and not on another forum like Polygraph Place?

To: Figs

The Polygrpah Place took the easy way out.  They removed my advertisment without due process.  I guess when you own the website you can do as you like.

I don't like the attitude of guilty until proven innocent.  When you're at the top of the powers to be shitlist, this is what you get.  I have not had one polygraph person offer to help with the investigation.

I am proud to say I have never taken the easy position and accused anyone without sufficient proof.  I don't believe in jumping on the band wagon.  Anyone, can do that. That is very easy.  It is much more difficult to consider all the evidence and then make an informed decision free from prejudice and bias.

The Florida polygraph association members are like a pack of dogs, ready to pounce. I have been taking a lot of business from some of their top people for years.  They sure hope this is the last they will hear from me. Well it's not.

Taking this position has always cost me dearly in the past.  Both in my professional and personal life.  Whether I am guilty or not.  For the past eleven years I have been trying to rebuild my business and credibility.  All it takes is one negative to tear down all the good things built, thus far.

An accusation shouldn't be treated as the gospel unless there is clear and convincing evidence to support the allegation. There are two sides to every story.

I chose to post on your website because I like the majority of your members too have issues with the polygraph profession.  I needed a place to vent my anger and be heard. For this I thank you.

That's the best answer I have. There is a lot of information that has not been made public regarding my case.  I truly believe that our criminal justice system is still the best, but you have to utilize it.

I hope that soon, in the near future, I will be exonorated and restore some of my credibility.

William McCallister

All well and good Mr McCallister, but it does appear that you have been excommunicated from the high and holy world of the polygraph operators. Surely someone at APA will still be willing to support you. Maybe Don Krapole and the other elite illuminates of your great profession that still believe in you. Or maybe they have turned on you the same way that everyone who works in your profession is nothing more than an interrogator with a prop. No more, no less and its all about the confession, not the truth. But just like in a post-test. You appear to have failed the in-test portion. You can trust us  .... just confess  ....  I love this soap opera !!!

To: Dr. Phibes

Confess your ass...I love the fight!!!

William McCallister

DrPhibes,

Mr. McCallester is not a member of the APA or any other professional association, affiliated with polygraph, that I am aware of.  He is innocent until proven guilty.  I neither support nor condemn him, let us wait and see what a jury decides. 

Mr. McCallister, like all polygraphers you are a fraud and operate a fradulent machine. 

In my opinion, which does not require a presumption of innocence, you are also a sexual deviat.  This world will be a better place when you are back in jail.

Quote from: meangino on Jan 23, 2012, 11:02 PMMr. McCallister, like all polygraphers you are a fraud and 

Meangino,
Although you are able to post what you wish on this website, I personally don't support vicious personal attacks on people. Mr. McCallister is quite brave to air his views and take all the guff, in this regard I respect him. I am against the abuses of the polygraph, and many polygraphers indeed act like jerks, but others are quite civil and well meaning.

To:  Mr. Brown

I am a past full member of:

American Polygraph Association (APA)
Florida Polygraph Association (FPA)
American Association of Police Polygraphists (AAPP)

I am a current member of the American Society for Testing
& Matrerials.  For the past twelve years they have been setting the professional standards for the polygraph profession. Standardization is their goal.  I also subscribe to and follow the APA standards of practice.

I was formally trained 1983, by the late, Dr. William J. Yankee, former director of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DoDPI), Now called the Defense Academy for Credibility Assesment (DACA).

I am a past full member of:

American Polygraph Association (APA)
Florida Polygraph Association (FPA)
American Association of Police Polygraphists (AAPP)

I understand your "past" affiliations, I was commenting on current affiliations.  Also I had noted you are on an ASTM Committee, which anyone can join, and that committee is attempting to establish standardization and other improvements in the polygraph arena.  I do appreciate your attempts to "help" the polygraph industry, being on the news in a negative manner is counterproductive. 

I do wish you the best in your quest to clear your name, and will reserve any judgment until a court makes a decision or you make a plea bargain.  And I doubt there will be a plea bargain, you have indicated you intend to fight the allegations. 

I am sure many of your collegues in Florida would like to take your clientele  and increase their income, that could be the reason for some of the postings we have seen, and the polygraph community should not judge you prematurely. Not all persons in the industry stand in judgment, only a portion. 

To: Bill_Brown
I would like to be a member of Professional Organizations, but until my rights are restored, I must wait.  Even then there is no guarantee this will ever happen.

I sometimes attend seminars as a guest of a member.  This is the only way I can stay on top of new developments in the profession. ASTM is the only organization I can join, right now.

As-far-as advancing my knowledge, I learn a lot from sites such as this.

William McCallister

Mr McCallister's innocence or guilt will be determined by your judicial system. We (DrPhibes) withhold our judgement until then. We merely used the polygraph operators trick to elicit a confession for an unsuspecting person.

Now for this website antipolygraph.org, blocking IP's that are not traceable, leads itself to suspicions that this website, is not as advertised. Its what you did with DrPhibes last login.  Why is it so important to track IP's, and from research on this website, this organization shows a habit of identifying individuals. That lends itself to the question what are you collecting and for whom.

Upon further search, WIKIHOW polygraph: Discussion
has a terse writeup as to what this website really is. Further watching and investigation appears to be in order here. Other groups out there are posting some interesting things about this site. 4Chan.org Anonymous also reports some suspicions.

Cybercraft,

Until yesterday, this forum blocked IP addresses that are included in StopForumSpam.com's database. We blocked such IPs in an effort to counter Xrumer (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/XRumer)-generated forum spam.

As it turns out, many of the IPs in StopForumSpam.com's database are Tor exit nodes. This became evident when testing forum access through the Tails live CD, which I posted (https://antipolygraph.org/forum/index.php?topic=4881.msg36251#msg36251) about yesterday.

We have adopted an alternative method of countering XRumer and all IP blocks were lifted yesterday (24 January 2012).

Quote from: CyberCraft on Jan 25, 2012, 01:11 AMOther groups out there are posting some interesting things about this site. 4Chan.org Anonymous also reports some suspicions.

Please elaborate. What does Anonymous think about AntiPolygraph.org?

2007 New Florida Law Revision
House Bill 989 (Ch. 2007-129): Victims; Sexual Offenses; Polygraph; HIV; Courts; Forensic Physical Examinations; Attorney General

Per revisions to F.S. 960.001, provides that no alleged victim of a sexual battery shall be required to take a polygraph examination or other truth-telling device as a condition of proceeding with an investigation.  Such a refusal by the alleged victim shall not preclude further investigation of the alleged offence.  IN addition, new language in the same section provides that upon request by the victim or the victim's parent, guardian, or lawful representative, a victim advocate shall be present at the forensic examination of the alleged victim.  A change to F.S. 960.28 requires that the initial forensic examination of the alleged victim shall be paid for by the Crime Vicitim's Services Office of the Attorney General.  Also amends F.S. 960.003 to require that, upon court order, any person charged with certain offenses involving the transmission of bodily fluids shall undergo HIV testing within 48 hours of such court order.

Effective Date: July 1, 2007.

........


No wonder we have a significant increase in alleged sexual abuse allegations.

William McCallister

Mr. McCallister,

Victims are not subjected to polygraphs for a reason.  They should not be subjected to further trauma.  Are innocent persons convicted of crimes?  Yes, and in many cases polygraph has assisted the innocent.  I am aware of a number of cases in Texas that were reversed and remanded when polygraph was used on suspects and the suspects showed truthful, sparking a further investigation and of the agent used to make the cases.  The new evidence obtained in the investigation cleared the innocent and also allowed the guilty to be released from custody.  When used properly polygraph is a valuable aid to an investigation. 

You are evidently wanting your accusers to take polygraph examinations in an attempt to clear your name.  Have you, yourself taken a polygraph examination?  If so then I would suggest the persons making allegations against you consider paired testing and see what the results show.  The increase in allegations of sexual abuse may be the result of something other than false allegations. 

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Apr 01, 2012, 01:32 PMVictims are not subjected to polygraphs for a reason.  They should not be subjected to further trauma.

Why are polygraphs traumadic?

Figs

The polygraph is not the trauma, reliving the event can be a trauma. 

Quote from: Bill_Brown on Apr 02, 2012, 01:47 PMFigs

The polygraph is not the trauma, reliving the event can be a trauma. 

Why wouldnt the same be true for a witness if the trauma is reliving the event, and not the polygraph interrogation itself?

Mr. Brown

No, I have not taken a polygraph examination in order to clear my name.  First off, If I pass the examination the powers to be would most likely say "He passed the test because he is an examiner and has the ability to cheat the test."  Imagine that???

The thing I fear, at this point in my case, is I would take the test and the Florida Polygraph Association with their law enforcement connected examiners will report false findings, just like they did in 1985. Imagine that too???

Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me!!!

William McCallister

Quote from: 7C737D691A0 on Apr 02, 2012, 04:27 PMWhy wouldnt the same be true for a witness if the trauma is reliving the event, and not the polygraph interrogation itself? 

Very good point figs...direct cross examination could actually be more traumatic. If the police are such advocates of the polygraph, then they should have no problem "testing" both accuser and alleged perpetrator.

QuoteFirst off, If I pass the examination the powers to be would most likely say "He passed the test because he is an examiner and has the ability to cheat the test."

So countermeasures do work? Imagine that.

William, do yourself a favor and lose the cliches.

stefano,

You are aware that most examiners don't test victims unless the "suspect" has been subjected to polygraph and shown truthful.  I would consider then doing paired testing, and the alleged victim would be tested.  It appears that Florida Law does bar testing of victims.  It does not bar Mr. McCallister being examined. 

Mr. McCallister,

There are qualified examiners that will test you outside the State of Florida.  Why don't you enlist one of these examiners and request your results be forwarded to the agency investigating your case.  The key word is "Qualified Examiner" by DOD standards.  Not someone you are associated with or anyone that would have a bias for or against you.  i would suggest you go to a retired FBI or retired DOD examiner and make all reports available to him/her. 

What a singularly repulsive fellow.

Quote from: lane99 on Apr 05, 2012, 12:34 PMWhat a singularly repulsive fellow. 

Do you have anything more substantial to contribute to the discussion beyond a personal attack?

To: Bill_Brown

That would be nice, but here is what happened the last time I tried to prove my innocence using the polygraph.

Remember, I was accused of sexually harassing potential employees of the Sheriff's Department way back in 1985. Eight month's after they were tested and the third day of a front page Lakeland Ledger Newspaper article about the Sheriff's hiring practives?

The first examination was administered in Orlando, FL by a firm called Les Levy & Associates.  They sent a report to the Sheriff calling my charts deceptive.  I asked for a re-test and was denied. (Sheriff paid)

Next, I went to a firm called Argenbright & Associates, Inc., Tampa, FL run then by, now, Florida Polygraph Association, vice president, private sector, Wade Moss.  He sent a report calling me deceptive, but to my face called me inconclusive. I told Wade Moss not to send a report anyone because Moss said it was inconclusive. (I paid)

Next, I flew to the University of Utah, Psychology  Department for testing by Dr. David Raskin and Dr. Charles Honts, both University professors and researchers for the Department of Defense.  After a battery of tests were administerd they called my test results truthful. (I paid for this test)

The University of Utah, polygraph report was forwarded to the Sheriff.  The Sheriff called me into the office and told me that he would not accept the truthful report by Dr. Raskin & Dr. Honts because I paid for the test myself. Great logic on the part of the Sheriff. Imagine that???

I was only tested by, at that time, the premier academic polygraph testing and research center in the world. Don't figure.

And you guys want me to submit to testing & diagnostics by whom???  Like I said before, Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

When I filed my lawsuits against Moss and Levy, we sent an investigator with a subpoena to get charts and score sheets. Even though, at that time, the State of Florida Licensed Polygraph Examiners and the administrative law clearly stated that all work product was to be saved for three (3) years, you guessed it, no charts were ever found to exist.

But that was probably my fault because I told Argenbright, Moss and Levy that Dr. Raskin was going to be called in and get a piece of their ass!!!  No wonder the charts disapeared.

I was, finally, cleared of all wrong doing after a five day administrative hearing in 1986 (See attached file).
Dr. William Yankee, former Director of Department of Defense, Polygraph Institute was called in by my attorney's to testify that I ran a good test on the women and followed professional rules of conduct. That accusation cost me $34,000.00 in attorney fees, and my license was suspended for eight months. Don't figure!!!

Thank you, State of Florida, for having such strict standards for polygraph examiner conduct.  I guess those standards only were applicable to me.  The incompetent examiners, Argenbright, Moss and Levy were never sanctioned or diciplined for destroying charts and sending false reports to the Sheriff.

Now, Law Enforcement and Florida Polygraph Association is all up in arms and want to re-instate licensing laws because of the complaints that are being made against me.  Why don't they see if the allegations are true, first.

Remember the term, Rush to Judgement?

William Mccallister

You want the alleged victim to submit to polygraph testing, however you have not.  You could use Dr. Raskin or Dr. Honts and have them conduct the examination.  You seem to be comfortable with them.  Dr. Raskin will testify in court for you if he finds you to be truthful.  He is a qualified expert witness in several cases I am aware of and an excellent examiner.  As you are aware, polygraph has been admitted in court in several states over objection by prosecutors. 

To: Bill_Brown

Since you know this to be true, tell me where polygraph examination results have been admitted in State court over the objections of prosecutors.

William McCallister

To: Bill_Brown

Why don't I just get a change of venue and move my court case out of Florida.  We'll just hold the trial in one of those mystery States!!! How about that???  That dog won't hunt in Florida. Where do you come up with this stuff???

William McCallister

QuoteTo: Bill_Brown

Since you know this to be true, tell me where polygraph examination results have been admitted in State court over the objections of prosecutors.

William McCallister

QuoteTo: Bill_Brown

Why don't I just get a change of venue and move my court case out of Florida.  We'll just hold the trial in one of those mystery States!!! How about that???  That dog won't hunt in Florida. Where do you come up with this stuff???

William McCallister

The dog hunts!  You should be familiar with cases in your state and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.  According to the case below, you have a right to have polygraph admitted in Florida Courts under your circumstances.  Check with your attorney.  I come up with this "Stuff" when I watch Appellate Court Cases and US Supreme Court Cases. 

United States v. Piccinonna, 885 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir. 1989)

Eleventh Circuit held that polygraph results are admissible (1) when the parties stipulate to admissibility in advance of the test; or (2) when the polygraph results are used to impeach or corroborate the testimony of a witness. In the latter circumstance, the party seeking to introduce the polygraph results must provide adequate notice to the opposing party; the opposing party must be given adequate opportunity to have its own polygraph expert administer a test covering substantially the same questions; and the evidence must be admissible under the rules governing corroboration or impeachment.

To: Bill_Brown

You said the polygraph results could be admitted even over the objection of the prosecution.  According to what you wrote, the Federal statute does not imply that.

I understand stipulated polygraph testing to mean that both parties have to agree.  How do you get around that little obstacle.  If the prosecution objects, how do you get the results admitted???  In Federal court, maybe; but not in State court.

William McCallister

To: Bill_Brown

Can you give me a cite, so I can see this for myself?
A cite pertaining to Florida law, specifically.

885 F.2d 1529    58 USLW 2234, 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1431  UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant.  No. 86-5335.United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.  Sept. 28, 1989.

Dr Raskin has testified in State and Federal Courts on Polygraph.  New Mexico allows polygraph evidence.  There are many other cases where polygraph has been admitted.  Do some research and you will find the cases.  The above cite is only one that pertains to a Federal District Court in Florida.  11th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded because polygraph was not admitted.  You should really check with your attorney on this. 

You wanted a cite to a Florida case, and you should be doing that research.  11th Circuit overrides Florida State rulings. 

To: Bill_Brown

Just as I thought, no case in Florida supports your position on this issue. It is, therefore, a moot point, right?

You made the claim, can't back it up and explain it away by telling me to do the research, right.

To. Bill_Brown

Oh! Almost forgot.... That dog won't hunt in FLORIDA!!!

Mr. McCallister,

You need to study law much more.  A decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is dominant over Florida law and sets the precidence for admissibility.  I was informed that persons incarcerated for the amount of time you were incarcerated actually learned law and how decisions by the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court affect all courts at law.  My mistake, I have furnished you with what you requested and you are not able to understand the significance of that decision.  It directly affects you in the State of Florida. 

A Florida Case is:

IN THE
 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. SC96767, THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. F. LEE BAILEY,  Respondent.  This case is important to your case also.  It does not allow polygraph in this case but is interesting.  Look it up and read it. 

In New Mexico polygraph is admissible by New Mexico Supreme Court rule 707.  (Over any objections by the state or the defendant).  Texas has allowed polygraph in District Court also. 

I must say you are pompous and arrogant.  I will not offend you further by offering tools that may aid you in your quest to clear your name. 

To: Bill_Brown aka F. Lee Bailey, Johnny Cochran, Matlock or whoever you think you are...

You made a direct statement to me regarding polygraph results being admitted in State Courts over the objection by prosecutors.

All I ask is that you give me just one cite where that occurred. Specifically, In the State of Florida. Just because you say it's true doesn't necessairly mean so, right???

Stay on point Counselor!!!!!!

P.S. Boy! I'm glad you're not my attorney!!!

Mr. Brown,

It ain't much fun when the rabbit gets the gun! Understand?

Mr. McCallister,

You are 100% correct and i will refrain from further posts regarding your situation.  Have a good day.

Mr. Brown,

Thank-you kindly; you also have a nice day!

Quote from: stefano on Apr 05, 2012, 09:46 PM

Quote from: lane99 on Apr 05, 2012, 12:34 PMWhat a singularly repulsive fellow. 

Do you have anything more substantial to contribute to the discussion beyond a personal attack?

I consider it substantive to warn the public about sexual predators.  If you don't, we'll have to agree to disagree.

To: Lane99

I have never been convicted of any sexual crime. Therefore, your designation is incorrect.

Why don't you come out of the closet and identify yourself. You sound like one of the Florida Polygraph Association members that would like me to go away. Sorry Charlie!!!

To: Lane99

This is a perfect example of why detectives should polygraph potential victims of sexual assault.

If the alleged victim cannot pass the examination, the detectives should take safeguards to insure that all angles of the casefacts are investigated before making an arrest.

The last thing we want to do is falsely accuse an innocent person of commiting a sexual crime.

Example: **************************************

POLK COUNTY -- APRIL 14, 2012
A civilian employee with the Polk County Sheriff's Office was arrested after deputies say she lied about being sexually battered by her father.

Polk County Sheriff's Special Victims detectives arrested and charged 26-year-old Heather Johnson of Winter Haven with one count false reporting to law enforcement regarding a capital felony.

According to the affidavit, Johnson told detectives that when she was 5 years old, she was sexually battered by her biological father, and that she had not had contact with him since.

After conducting a full investigation and interviewing all parties involved, detectives again interviewed Johnson, who admitted she lied about what she had reported, according to the sheriff's office.

Johnson resigned immediately upon her arrest. She has been booked into the Polk County Jail. 

Before her arrest and resignation, Johnson was most recently assigned as a Telecommunications Shift Supervisor.

She originally worked for Polk County Fire/EMS as a dispatcher, and was hired in July 2010 as a PCSO Telecommunicator just prior to the joint Polk County Sheriff's Emergency Communications Center becoming operational.

Quote from: William McCallister on Apr 15, 2012, 12:53 PMTo: Lane99

This is a perfect example of why detectives should polygraph potential victims of sexual assault.

If the alleged victim cannot pass the examination, the detectives should take safeguards to insure that all angles of the casefacts are investigated before making an arrest.

The last thing we want to do is falsely accuse an innocent person of commiting a sexual crime.

Example: **************************************

POLK COUNTY -- APRIL 14, 2012
A civilian employee with the Polk County Sheriff's Office was arrested after deputies say she lied about being sexually battered by her father.

Polk County Sheriff's Special Victims detectives arrested and charged 26-year-old Heather Johnson of Winter Haven with one count false reporting to law enforcement regarding a capital felony.

According to the affidavit, Johnson told detectives that when she was 5 years old, she was sexually battered by her biological father, and that she had not had contact with him since.

After conducting a full investigation and interviewing all parties involved, detectives again interviewed Johnson, who admitted she lied about what she had reported, according to the sheriff's office.

Johnson resigned immediately upon her arrest. She has been booked into the Polk County Jail. 

Before her arrest and resignation, Johnson was most recently assigned as a Telecommunications Shift Supervisor.

She originally worked for Polk County Fire/EMS as a dispatcher, and was hired in July 2010 as a PCSO Telecommunicator just prior to the joint Polk County Sheriff's Emergency Communications Center becoming operational.

This doesn't seem like an example of why victims should be polygraphed.  It seems like an excellent example of why investigations are superior to polygraphs.

If there is no evidence of sexual assault, why would the victim be polygraphed?  In order to pile on the trauma?  With no evidence other than a polygraph result the case will not go forward.

If there is evidence of sexual assault, why would the victim by polygraphed?  To further traumatize her? 

'au contraire mon frere'

Polygraph examinations, when used properly, can be a great investigative tool pointing the investigation in the right direction.

There doen't need to be any hard core interrogation, thus, keeping the alleged victim from further trama, if indeed; the allegation is true.

It can also keep an innocent person from being tramatized. Both parties are important. Truth should be exposed, and only guilty parties punished. That is what true justice and the exposure of truth means to me.

Quote from: William McCallister on Apr 15, 2012, 02:42 PM'au contraire mon frere'

Polygraph examinations, when used properly, can be a great investigative tool pointing the investigation in the right direction.

There doen't need to be any hard core interrogation, thus, keeping the alleged victim from further trama, if indeed; the allegation is true.

It can also keep an innocent person from being tramatized. Both parties are important. Truth should be exposed, and only guilty parties punished. That is what true justice and the exposure of truth means to me.

If you don't induce or elicit some degree of stress, can you run an effective polygraph?

Why is it a good idea to stress the victim of a sexual assault?

If there is evidence the victim is manufacturing a story in order to victimize someone else, then they have become the subject of an investigation themselves and could certainly be polygraphed.  If there is no evidence of such fabrication, why would you stress and re-victimize a victim of a sexual assault?

When there is evidence the victim is manufacturing or confabulating a story, regarding the suspect, then ask them to take a polygraph.  If there is no evidence of this, then absolutely do not stress, tramatize and re-victimize any sexual assault victim. I certainly would not.

But, if there is well-founded suspicion that the victim is not being truthful about the alleged sexual assault a more indepth investigation is demanded and expected to ensure justice. Especially, when the suspect is adamant the sexual assault did not happen.

If the suspect lawyers up you can't test them. If this happens, ask the other party (alleged victim) "could you pass a polygraph examination regarding this complaint?" Usually, the person will say "yes".

You should not make anyone feel that you do not believe them unless you have additional proofs, post-test. There should be no interrogation before administering the test.  The polygraph should only be used in cases where victim and suspect tell different stories. He said, She said.

Since the 5th amendment of the US Constitution protects suspects from making self incriminating statements, no intimidation or threats should ever be used. Attorneys sometime have their client tested privately then release results, if they exonerate the client.

In any event, the polygraph should never be used as a scare tactic, on anyone, period. It should only be used to point the investigation in the right direction.

Due to recent changes in Florida law.  The victim of sexual assault cannot be requested to take a polygraph test.  Therefore, unless you have physical evidence, it is often difficult to determine the truth.   

2007 New Florida Law Revision
House Bill 989 (Ch. 2007-129): Victims; Sexual Offenses; Polygraph; HIV; Courts; Forensic Physical Examinations; Attorney General

Per revisions to F.S. 960.001, provides that no alleged victim of a sexual battery shall be required to take a polygraph examination or other truth-telling device as a condition of proceeding with an investigation.  Such a refusal by the alleged victim shall not preclude further investigation of the alleged offence.  IN addition, new language in the same section provides that upon request by the victim or the victim's parent, guardian, or lawful representative, a victim advocate shall be present at the forensic examination of the alleged victim.  A change to F.S. 960.28 requires that the initial forensic examination of the alleged victim shall be paid for by the Crime Vicitim's Services Office of the Attorney General.  Also amends F.S. 960.003 to require that, upon court order, any person charged with certain offenses involving the transmission of bodily fluids shall undergo HIV testing within 48 hours of such court order.

Effective Date: July 1, 2007.

According to the language in this law.  You can request but not require the alleged victim, of a sexual battery, to submit to polygraph testing.

they live at 510 farrington way orlando fl 32837

Quote from: William McCallister on Dec 30, 2011, 09:32 PMATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

I already have that address.  What I need is who is the victim in New York and how can I contact them?

William McCallister

Attention Florida area:

McCallister, cops charge, then told the woman how she could remedy her purported problem. "If you give me a blow job," he said, "then I will tell your husband that you passed." Recalling that she was becoming dizzy and faint, the woman said that McCallister warned that her spouse would divorce her if he found out she failed the polygraph test.
At this point, McCallister reached inside the woman's shirt and began fondling her breasts. He then "reached his hand down in front of her and rubbed her vagina on the outside of her pants." While he was groping, McCallister asked the woman a series of questions about her sex life and masturbation.

Quote from: unknown user on Apr 25, 2012, 07:47 PMthey live at 510 farrington way orlando fl 32837

Quote from: William McCallister on Dec 30, 2011, 09:32 PMATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

The info was develped betwen 1993-2005 and the victim is posibly 2 years of age. That makes this a very serious aleged crime.

I believe in Florida, assalt on a fetus is a class F fellony. How much more serious is assalt on a unfertilised egg?

Polygraph operator William McCallister has now been charged with 31 counts of possession of child pornography:

Quotehttp://www.theledger.com/article/20121106/NEWS/121109498

Ex-Polygrapher For The Polk County Sheriff's Office Charged With Child Porn

Published: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 at 9:24 p.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 at 9:24 p.m.

A former polygraph examiner for the Polk County Sheriff's Office was booked into the Polk County jail Tuesday on 31 counts of possession of child pornography.

The pornography charges were filed against William McCallister, 59, of Lake Wales, by the State Attorney's Office, who say the 31 images were found on one of McCallister's computers.

McCallister, who operated Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc. in Winter Haven, has an extensive criminal history and has been the subject of a multi-agency investigation that police say began in December, when McCallister was accused of drugging and sexually battering a woman during a polygraph exam.

Quotehttp://www.wtsp.com/news/local/article/281327/8/Former-polygraph-examiner-in-trouble-again-this-time-for-child-porn

William McCallister is in jail again, this time on child porn charges

Lake Wales, Florida -- A man, part of an ongoing investigation involving multiple agencies, was arrested Tuesday after numerous child porn files were found on his computers.

Authorities say the investigation into 59-year-old William McCallister began in December 2011 after the Winter Haven Police Department received information he drugged a woman at his Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc. (http://winterhaven.wtsp.com/news/news/95928-polygraph-examiner-gives-customer-date-rape-drug) and sexually battered her during a polygraph exam. In that incident, he was charged with delivery of a controlled substance, extortion and attempted sexual battery.

Then in August 2012 during a search at his Lake Wales home, Polk County detectives found a .357 Smith and Wesson revolver. He was charged with possession on a firearm by a convicted felon.

Most recently, detectives found 31 images of child porn on his home computers and have charged him with 31 counts possession of child porn and violation of pre-trial release conditions.

McCallister's criminal arrest history includes serving 15 years in prison for seven counts of robbery, kidnapping and two counts of administering barbiturates in 1992 after the Orange County Sheriff's Office investigated cases where he was suspected of drugging women in bars.

Detectives believe McCallister may have other vicitms who have yet to come forward. Anyone with information about McCallister's crimes is urged to contact the Polk County Sheriff's Office at 863-298-6200.

Bill McCallister is now meeting a whole bunch of new and intimate friends in that Florida Jail  .... I hope he squirms more than the people he screwed over in the polygraph room.   What you dished out is now coming back there Bill !!!

ha! thats rich. I'd love to see him take is own test now. He'd probably pass.

Of interest was Mr McCallister's repeated (self-serving?) comments about discrepancies in all his prior cases and convictions. I have no personal knowledge of Polk County politics and live far away from Florida but it would appear that, in this case, where there is repeated 'smoke' there is indeed fire.
McCallister's statements should amply prove the mindset of the career criminal... deny, mislead, smokescreens and lies on top of fabrications. When anyone questions conviction rates in what might appear to be an 'obvious' crime they simply need to refer back to the psychology of the permanent perpetrator and discover how difficult obtaining truth (if possible ever) is for the system.
I'm not sure what purpose all his ramblings had but in a short 'comment' about his arrest a person who (stated) knew him and his family wrote this, "You are a sick dumbass that cares more for a dollar bill than a human life. I want to mix your blood with your freckles."  And so it goes (get rid of the glasses kid).

Bend over and kiss your ass good bye Bill.  Take Shaffer with you.  

http://www.polksheriff.org/inq/pages/inmate.aspx?BookingNumber=2012-028031

Interesting list of Crimes Mr. McCallister is charged with in addition to the original charge he listed. 

George Maschke,

Just wanted to give you the results of my two year nine month trek through the criminal justice system.  December 14, 2011 thru September 12, 2014.

The bottom line is this.  I had thirty seven (37) felony counts leveled against me.  Alleged sexual battery (2 cts.), extortion, delivery of alprazolam, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of child porn (31 cts.) and Interception of wire/electronic communication.

On September 12, 2004, I took a negotiated plea. All sex crimes were dropped. I pled guilty to delivery of alprazolam, attempted possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and interception of wire/electronic communication. All third degree felonies punishable by up to five years each.

The thirty four (34) remaining charges, were nol-prossed (dropped/abandoned) by the state attorney.  I was placed on probation and released from custody. Remember, I spent over two years in jail, fighting these charges.

If you throw enough criminal charges at a person, some are bound to stick.  Whether or not I am guilty of these alleged crimes, does not matter.  I did what was best for me to limit liability, in these cases.

Sincerely,

William McCallister

Mr. McCallister,

Thank you for the update on the disposition of your case.

you disgusting animal mccalister, i was a victim of yours you drugged and kidnapped me whilst i was a young girl on holiday, i picked you out of a photo book to the orange county sherrif , you got me from the marriott hotel in kissemee and you drugged me sexually assaulted me, robbed and stripped and threw me on the roadside, i had to leave as my holday was over and i was incontact with the police who kept me up to date with your sentance. how the hell have you got away with a string of offences ever since, i am going to get my case reopened.....it will never be over you sick bastasrd

you have opened a can of worms that should have been dealt with years ago, animal like you can not be allowed to mix with society. you ruined my life and lots of other lifes too. you were an ex copper too wasnt you ? you gave me a blue pill didnt you? you were working with HELGA wasnt you? who do you think you are..............im coming for you you sick sick sick perverted animal PEABODY HOTEL RING ANY BELLS

Quoteim coming for you you sick sick sick perverted animal

Caroline, I don't think such postings, here or elsewhere, will serve to bring you any kind of justice. In fact, they may just backfire on you. If you feel you have been wronged, consulting an attorney would be the prudent path forward.

Aunty agrees with the Angel.  It is a bad idea to publicly threaten someone who has ruined many lives.  One of his other enemies might murder him, and the police would consider anyone who has ever threatened him to be a suspect.

Aunty advises you to get together with all[1] of McCallister's other victims and seek legal counsel[2] to explore what can be done.  Counsel will also help you find a sympathetic district attorney in an effective venue.

-Aunty.
________________________________________________
[1] Or as many as you can convince to join you.
[2] Not necessarily hire a lawyer -- there are many legal aid societies and victim's rights organizations that will put you on the right track for no payment.

Interesting...  The use of a polygraph to extort sex.  If you don't provide my gratification then I will state you are lying and it will lead to divorce.  Awesome, I wonder how often this has happened?

Quote from: broztito on Nov 20, 2015, 01:45 PMInteresting...  The use of a polygraph to extort sex.  If you don't provide my gratification then I will state you are lying and it will lead to divorce.  Awesome, I wonder how often this has happened?
                   

Anyone whose spouse is dumb enough to believe in polygraph witchcraft and then subsequently seeks divorce based on polygraph results is probably better off in the long run. 

William McCallister secretly is back in the Lie Detection business.

floridatruthverification.com    Converus Eye Detect service

Helga Depollo is still his partner in crime, but she is not around, and she does not answer the phone.
He answers the phone "George"
He travels the state offering Eye Detect tests in a black Mercedes sprinter mobile office.
He will not be exposed to any security cameras in office buildings or hotels.

Converus Eye Detect, lie detection service in Utah is well aware that they are supllying convicted felon William McCallister, their Eye Detect test licenses.
Converus is selling their test supplies to:
floridatruthverification.com
which is operated by McCallister and his wife.
He answered the phone "George".
William McCallister is violating his parole by being back in the lie detection business.
McCallister was arrested for drugging a woman in his WinterHaven office, when he was a Polygraph Examiner.
McCallister was also arrested for kidnapping and credit card fraud, when he and Helga LaPollo operated a tourist transportation service in the Orlando area.

Converus feel that they are selling their product to Helga LaPollo, William McCallister's wife, therefore it is ok.

Helga Lapollo, has been involved with William McCallister crimes during the past 30 years.

William McCallister now travels throghout the state of Florida, selling Eye Detect tests for Converus, in a black Mercedes Sprinter van, that he uses for a mobile office.
He does not dare to be recorded by any security cameras found in standard office buildings, or hotel conference room lobbies or parking lots.