- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 28, 2003, 05:04 PMI MEAN PASSED!! Yikes!
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 28, 2003, 05:03 PMJohn:
I know the wait is brutal!! I haven't slept more then four hours a night since the test. People don't realize this "BS" test determines our life!!! Anyway..normally the FBI will not contact you if you passed. If it's over two weeks then you should assume you past. You can call your application coord, or the HR in HQ to find out. My case is a little different, and I don't know why? My field office Coord. told me I should expect a call from him in a week either good/bad?
I know the wait is brutal!! I haven't slept more then four hours a night since the test. People don't realize this "BS" test determines our life!!! Anyway..normally the FBI will not contact you if you passed. If it's over two weeks then you should assume you past. You can call your application coord, or the HR in HQ to find out. My case is a little different, and I don't know why? My field office Coord. told me I should expect a call from him in a week either good/bad?
Posted by JohnBoy
- Jul 28, 2003, 04:57 PMMike Epps,
I took my poly a week and a half ago and still no word. Do they contact you either way? The wait is killing me!! I would like to believe that they let you know fairly quickly if you failed but I have seen other posts on this board where the individual received the "bad letter" two weeks after the test. I wish they would let me know either way......for the love of God!
I took my poly a week and a half ago and still no word. Do they contact you either way? The wait is killing me!! I would like to believe that they let you know fairly quickly if you failed but I have seen other posts on this board where the individual received the "bad letter" two weeks after the test. I wish they would let me know either way......for the love of God!
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 28, 2003, 04:19 PMThanks "Anonymous" All very true!!! I will post my results when I get them this week.
Posted by Anonymous
- Jul 28, 2003, 04:12 PMMike Epps,
Re-read my last post containing an analysis of your NDI post-test with your examiner as well as Saidme's last post to you. If you believe that nonsense was done for your benefit and not the polygrapher's, perhaps I could sell you the Brooklyn Bridge. If your interests happen to coincide with the polygrapher's then so be it, but do not think for a second that they (your interests) will trump his own interests and motivations nor that they are necessarily the same. Best of luck to you, remember this little exercise for when you obtain your desired job and are later confronted with polygraphy in any of the many ways you might be and keep us posted...
Re-read my last post containing an analysis of your NDI post-test with your examiner as well as Saidme's last post to you. If you believe that nonsense was done for your benefit and not the polygrapher's, perhaps I could sell you the Brooklyn Bridge. If your interests happen to coincide with the polygrapher's then so be it, but do not think for a second that they (your interests) will trump his own interests and motivations nor that they are necessarily the same. Best of luck to you, remember this little exercise for when you obtain your desired job and are later confronted with polygraphy in any of the many ways you might be and keep us posted...
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 28, 2003, 03:39 PMThanks "Saidme" for your good info!!
Posted by Saidme
- Jul 28, 2003, 02:29 PMMike
Sounds like you probably passed. Actually, the examiner was probably doing you a favor. Let's say you go on to have a successful FBI career and somewhere along the line someone makes a false allegation against you for police brutality or someother police related crime. Generally, the examiner was probably setting you up for that exam that may never occur. At the time it probably seemed uncomfortable but the examiner isn't doing it just to watch you squirm. There's a reason behind everything.
Sounds like you probably passed. Actually, the examiner was probably doing you a favor. Let's say you go on to have a successful FBI career and somewhere along the line someone makes a false allegation against you for police brutality or someother police related crime. Generally, the examiner was probably setting you up for that exam that may never occur. At the time it probably seemed uncomfortable but the examiner isn't doing it just to watch you squirm. There's a reason behind everything.
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 28, 2003, 11:07 AMThanks for the great info!! I will know my results this week. Right now I'm between writing my letter to "Mr. Muller," and finding a person to sell my house for a new FBI career. VERY STRESSFULL!!
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 27, 2003, 09:54 PMWOW..Thanks for replying! That is so shady!! I will be sure to let everyone know on here on my results. I expect them this upcoming week! I'm wondering if I should start my letter to Mr. Muller, or get ready to sell my house for a new FBI career (Very Stressfull!!) I know a couple of my local Congressman real well. If I fail my poly, could they help me??
Posted by Anonymous
- Jul 27, 2003, 07:18 PMMike Epps,
You write:
This is a very good question you ask, and one I don't remember having seen asked or answered on this board before. You ask why the silly parting games with a deemed to be non-deceptive examinee. Essentially there are two reasons. The primary is a face saving one. If the agency quality control group changes/overturns the examiner NDI call to an inconclusive or DI result.... and the examiner has already told you that you have some minor problems with relevant (really control issues) and he/she has to come back and tell you that the HQ group has overturned his initial opinion, then he/she doesn't appear to be quite the inept stargazer that he/she in fact is. The second reason would be that you or somebody you know will likely take a polygraph exam in the future. They want you to think the exam you took actually worked for future exam purposes. If in fact you actually "beat it", i.e., successfully lied on actual relevant questions, but they lied to you by telling you that you had problems on these lesser relevant (really control) questions, then perhaps you will think in the back of your mind that although you seemed to have gotten through without negative consequences that there really is something to this nonsense when you have to face it again. But now you know...
You write:
Quote...THANK YOU!!! THAT"S WHAT I THOUGHT!!! I told the truth on ALL relevent questions. When asked if I ever told a white lie in my life...I told about stealing gum as a kid, but eveyone can go for days on this question, so I just left it with the gum. If you are deemed truthful on FBI "relevent" questions..Is that passing?? Why can't the examiner just let me go?? Why does he have to play games?? Very disturbing to me!!...
This is a very good question you ask, and one I don't remember having seen asked or answered on this board before. You ask why the silly parting games with a deemed to be non-deceptive examinee. Essentially there are two reasons. The primary is a face saving one. If the agency quality control group changes/overturns the examiner NDI call to an inconclusive or DI result.... and the examiner has already told you that you have some minor problems with relevant (really control issues) and he/she has to come back and tell you that the HQ group has overturned his initial opinion, then he/she doesn't appear to be quite the inept stargazer that he/she in fact is. The second reason would be that you or somebody you know will likely take a polygraph exam in the future. They want you to think the exam you took actually worked for future exam purposes. If in fact you actually "beat it", i.e., successfully lied on actual relevant questions, but they lied to you by telling you that you had problems on these lesser relevant (really control) questions, then perhaps you will think in the back of your mind that although you seemed to have gotten through without negative consequences that there really is something to this nonsense when you have to face it again. But now you know...
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 27, 2003, 06:06 PMTHANK YOU!!! THAT"S WHAT I THOUGHT!!! I told the truth on ALL relevent questions. When asked if I ever told a white lie in my life...I told about stealing gum as a kid, but eveyone can go for days on this question, so I just left it with the gum. If you are deemed truthful on FBI "relevent" questions..Is that passing?? Why can't the examiner just let me go?? Why does he have to play games?? Very disturbing to me!!
Posted by Anonymous
- Jul 27, 2003, 04:58 PMMike Epps,
You are quite correct. With a control question test (CQT) polygraph exam, you essentially either fail the control or the relevant questions (not that there is any connection to lie or truth telling, but there most definitely are real consequences following an arbitrary determination of deception or no deception rendered by the soothsayer/polygraph operator). If you are found to be NDI, a polygraph examiner will let you know that you have "failed"/have significant responses to/were deceptive to, etc to the control questions. The aspect of fraud which comes to play at this point (as was the case in reviewing the questions initially in the pre-test phase) is to make you believe/allow you to continue believe that these are relevant questions (perhaps of less importance than the ones you did "pass"). The good news is that you will no longer fall for this gambit, nor be left thinking that you are guilty of committing some heinous sin relevant to the job you are applying for, and should you be unfortunate to undergo such an exercise in foolishness again, you will know of the deception (not yours but theirs) in advance...forewarned is forearmed, yes?
You are quite correct. With a control question test (CQT) polygraph exam, you essentially either fail the control or the relevant questions (not that there is any connection to lie or truth telling, but there most definitely are real consequences following an arbitrary determination of deception or no deception rendered by the soothsayer/polygraph operator). If you are found to be NDI, a polygraph examiner will let you know that you have "failed"/have significant responses to/were deceptive to, etc to the control questions. The aspect of fraud which comes to play at this point (as was the case in reviewing the questions initially in the pre-test phase) is to make you believe/allow you to continue believe that these are relevant questions (perhaps of less importance than the ones you did "pass"). The good news is that you will no longer fall for this gambit, nor be left thinking that you are guilty of committing some heinous sin relevant to the job you are applying for, and should you be unfortunate to undergo such an exercise in foolishness again, you will know of the deception (not yours but theirs) in advance...forewarned is forearmed, yes?
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 27, 2003, 03:21 PMSaidme & George:
Isn't it true if examiners do not deem you as "DI," they still will try to make it seem you were not telling the truth before you leave the room? That's what I felt happened to me? Thank you again for your time!
Isn't it true if examiners do not deem you as "DI," they still will try to make it seem you were not telling the truth before you leave the room? That's what I felt happened to me? Thank you again for your time!
Posted by Mike Epps
- Jul 25, 2003, 06:54 PMHuman Subject:
Did your examiner state he wasn't sure if you passed/failed? Mine would not tell me? Why wouldn't he give me his opinion?
?
Did your examiner state he wasn't sure if you passed/failed? Mine would not tell me? Why wouldn't he give me his opinion?
?Posted by George W. Maschke
- Jul 25, 2003, 06:37 PMMike,
I don't know how many people at FBI HQ make the determination on applicant polygraph examinations. Those making the determination are themselves polygraph examiners.
A "borderline" polygraph examination would be an "inconclusive" one, and the applicant might be scheduled for a re-test. To the best of my knowledge, the rest of a candidate's application is not a factor in the scoring of his/her polygraph charts.
I don't know how many people at FBI HQ make the determination on applicant polygraph examinations. Those making the determination are themselves polygraph examiners.
A "borderline" polygraph examination would be an "inconclusive" one, and the applicant might be scheduled for a re-test. To the best of my knowledge, the rest of a candidate's application is not a factor in the scoring of his/her polygraph charts.