Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by treetop
 - Jul 03, 2003, 06:20 AM
Thank you for the information.  I am expecting the law enforcement agency I am applying for to use the CQT.  If they do, then I think I will do very well.
Posted by Skeptic
 - Jul 03, 2003, 03:32 AM
Quote from: treetop on Jul 02, 2003, 05:53 AMDuring a Relevant/Irrelevant test, when should one employ countermeasures?  How can countermeasures be used to avoid give a "con-spec-nificant" result?  From what I have read, I would be lead to believe that I would use countermeasures to enhance the responces to irrelevant questions and try to relax and keep baseline breathing during the relevant questions.  Any advice or thoughts?

Treetop,
Unfortunately, the R/I test doesn't seem to have an easy physiological countermeasure like the CQT, since there are no control questions upon which one may augment responses.  The advantage, though, is that the R/I exam is so thoroughly flawed  and produces so many false positives (and  that fact is widely known) that behavioral countermeasures combined with a lack of confessions may carry you through.

You might try randomly augmenting on various relevant questions as well as on irrelevant and "sacrifice relevant" questions that come at the beginning/end of a question set.

You might also try keeping a relatively augmented state going for most of the session.

I should note, however, that I know of no one who has tried either of those techniques, so can't gauge the results.

As you noted, examiners on R/I exams (e.g. for NSA screening) look for "con-spec-nificant" responses.  I would think the key, if there is one, would be to obscure findings on the "specific" and "significant" criteria.

The bottom line, though is that R/I exams primarily seem to be used not for "truth telling", but rather as leverage for getting confessions.

Skeptic
Posted by treetop
 - Jul 02, 2003, 05:53 AM
During a Relevant/Irrelevant test, when should one employ countermeasures?  How can countermeasures be used to avoid give a "con-spec-nificant" result?  From what I have read, I would be lead to believe that I would use countermeasures to enhance the responces to irrelevant questions and try to relax and keep baseline breathing during the relevant questions.  Any advice or thoughts?