Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Aug 09, 2009, 06:46 AM
FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds yesterday (Saturday, 7 August 2009), for the first time, spoke at full length and under oath about the governmental criminality she observed while working as an FBI language specialist shortly after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. For coverage of Edmonds' revelations, see "Deposition of Sibel Edmonds Completed, DoJ a 'No Show', Bombshells Under Oath" on The Brad Blog.

Edmonds' deposition was videotaped in its entirety, and the deposition is expected to be made available on-line. In the meantime, a video report filmed outside the National Whistleblowers Center, where the deposition was taken, is available via YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSvlwg3F6q0
Posted by 1904
 - Oct 30, 2007, 09:04 AM
Sheesh. Spies passing FBI polygraph tests
FBI Experts debunking the polygraph
FBI personnel blowing the whistle on the FBI
APA demigods with false Phd's
Polygraphers outing polygraphers

The house of polygraph is


Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 29, 2007, 11:24 AM
FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has made the momentous decision to go public with all of her allegations of criminality and coverup within the U.S. Government, facing the risk of criminal prosecution in the process. See "FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds Will Now Tell All - and Faces Charges if Necessary - to Any Major Television Network That Will Let Her" on The Brad Blog.
Posted by DocHoliday
 - Apr 02, 2007, 11:11 PM
Thanks for the update George.  

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 22, 2007, 06:02 AM
For a good overview and update on FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds allegations of criminal wrongdoing within the Bureau, Justice Department, and elsewhere, listen to ExpertWitnessRadio.org's recent two-part interview of investigative blogger Luke Ryland. Each mp3 file is 12.5 mb:

http://www.expertwitnessradio.org/members/downloads/expertWitness-2007-03-12-Ryland.mp3

http://www.expertwitnessradio.org/archives/expertWitness-2007-03-19-RylandWeekTwo.mp3

In addition, see Ryland's "Let Sibel Edmonds Speak" blog:

http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 04, 2007, 08:07 AM
The video of the CBS 60 Minutes report "Lost in Translation," which documents the allegations of FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, which include the FBI's penetration by a polygraph-passing Turkish spy, has been posted to YouTube.com and may be viewed here:
Alternatively, the segment may be downloaded as a 300 mb MPEG file here:

http://vestigialconscience.com/Sibel60Minutes.mpg
Posted by furedy
 - Oct 14, 2006, 07:46 AM
CANADIAN USES OF THE POLYGRAPH

Although not admissible as evidence, the polygraph is used in Canada both in its confession-inducing capacity in the case of crimes (a Toronto police polygrapher once memorably testified that he regarded himself as an interrogator with polygraphic training (i.e., the polygraph is a useful interrogatory prop), as well as in civil disputes where the polygrapher can either be "hostile" or "friendly".  In criminal cases it's actually useful for the Canadian polygraph industry that it is not admissible as evidence, as it is therefore also not open to cross examination.  So just as the ancient Roman critics were not able to inquire into the details of a specific entrails-reading "test", so the specifics of a specific polygraph "test" are also shrouded in mystery, while the social disease that this piece of superstition spreads permeates all of society, as any citizen can get into a dispute with another citizen.

All the best, John
Posted by DocHoliday
 - Oct 04, 2006, 02:55 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Maschke,

Thanks for the detailed response and links to Canadian government
Polygraph policy and guidelines.  There is definitely enough reading
material in there to last me for awhile :)  

I was aware that the Canadian Surveillance Intelligence Service (CSIS)
used the Polygraph for pre-employment screening, operations *AND*
evaluating Security Clearance.  As discussed here:
http://www.sirc-csars.gc.ca/pdfs/90-91_e.pdf#search=%22csis%20polygraph%22

I did not realize that the polygraph was used at the municipal level.
I do wonder what uses the Polygraph has at the municipal level and how
much trust is instilled in it's results.  

Regards,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFFIzAQBAnheQzh1NARAgnEAJ9k4jakoTxwy5XfJe82WZRTKowchwCglXrq
W2L7hndXZVYLKOhxfHpa4Go=
=Uj/W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 04, 2006, 01:38 AM
DocHoliday,

Don't be too smug about the U.S. government's foolish reliance on polygraphy: the Canadian government does the same, albeit to a lesser extent. The Canadian Police College operates a polygraph school and the RCMP (the FBI's Canadian counterpart) has begun requiring applicants to submit to pre-employment polygraph screening. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service also relies on polygraphy, as do many municipal police departments, especially in the western provinces.

Quote from: DocHoliday on Oct 03, 2006, 03:30 AMI find it humorous that United States government agencies still have faith in a flawed technology that has led to countless security breaches  :) If anyone can go buy a $50 tutorial that teaches the methodology behind exploiting the system, how can the government consciously still employ it.

- Proudly Canadian
Posted by DocHoliday
 - Oct 03, 2006, 10:13 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
eh? I think your on to something  ;D. Once again it's hard to believe that Polygraphy has been passed off as a science for so long, if not still to this day? Satan's rebirth would probably be in the form of a polygraph machine.

Doc Holiday :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFFIu2KBAnheQzh1NARAmxOAJ9vZ7JtiNNZRT9zQTfnmqQ9BDtUtACg+t+s
FkS3MI/DxBlnod0MHPN9lqE=
=SlLy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Posted by DippityShurff
 - Oct 03, 2006, 09:33 PM
Quote from: DocHoliday on Oct 03, 2006, 03:30 AMI find it humorous that United States government agencies still have faith in a flawed technology that has led to countless security breaches  :) If anyone can go buy a $50 tutorial that teaches the methodology behind exploiting the system, how can the government consciously still employ it.

- Proudly Canadian

Doc,

I know the answer to the above question.  It's because they have demons that have metastasized throughout their bodies and they now work for SATAN.  The aforementioned answer is at least as scientific as the polygraph, EH?

Proudly American!
Posted by DocHoliday
 - Oct 03, 2006, 03:30 AM
I find it humorous that United States government agencies still have faith in a flawed technology that has led to countless security breaches  :) If anyone can go buy a $50 tutorial that teaches the methodology behind exploiting the system, how can the government consciously still employ it.

- Proudly Canadian
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Sep 29, 2006, 01:32 AM
Citing anonymous intelligence community sources, independent journalist Wayne Madsen, a former Navy officer who served with the National Security Agency, has published (on 28 September 2006) a detailed special report concerning, among other things, the security concerns raised by FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. See http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/2006_09170928.php and scroll down to the second article.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jan 07, 2006, 06:12 AM
Para. 70 of Sibel Edmonds' federal tort claim filed 16 March 2005 includes an allegation that had previously escaped my notice:

QuoteUpon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that twelve other credible cases of possible espionage in the FBI/WFO/LAAU have been reported but not investigated due to fear of embarrassment as the individuals involved had already been granted a TOP SECRET security clearance by the FBI.

If hired since 1994, these twelve other individuals would have also passed FBI pre-employment polygraph examinations.
Posted by Fair Chance
 - Aug 07, 2005, 12:48 PM
Dear Readers,

This seems to be more the normal than the exception.  When the decision that you are not a "team player" is made in the FBI, the behavior of supervisors and other "team" players as written in this quote is expected protocol.  The classic "those who are not with us are against us."  There are no prisoners taken.  Malcontents must be destroyed psychologically, professionally, and personnally.  The problem is that they are being taken against citizens of our own country, not enemies in war.

Rather scary for an agency dedicated to protecting your Constitutional Rights.

Regards.