Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by John M.
 - Dec 06, 2017, 10:43 AM
It is astonishing how long this fraud and abuse has been allowed to continue.

It is indisputable fact that senior officials are flagrantly violating approved and relevant Department of Defense policy regarding the use and misuse of the polygraph and its "results".

How many billions are spent each year on this fraud?

How much louder does one need to blow the whistle?
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Dec 06, 2017, 05:46 AM
According to the National Cryptologic Museum Foundation, the NSA mandated pre-employment polygraph screening on 6 December 1952. Considering that the NSA polygraph program is now 65 years old, hasn't caught a spy, and yet has falsely branded thousands as liars, shouldn't it be placed into retirement?