Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by xenonman
 - Mar 24, 2017, 05:36 AM
Well, I was accused by an NSA polygrapher of concealing homosexual activity  ;D and was not hired there.  Not saying that the two factors were necessarily connected...  :D
Posted by O.rly?
 - Mar 21, 2017, 11:31 AM
Hello guys, and first of all thanks for maintaining this wonderful website, it surely helps alot for people like me, if not to cheat, but to calm yourself in preparation for the procedure you know nothing about.

So, I get hooked up to computerized polygraph, the "expert" proceeds to ask questions, at the end, he said, there are abnormalities, in questions regarding drug use and homosexual contact, which I explained(tried at least) as being a passionate opponent of the two. The interviewer looked kinda sad and like he was thinking "such a good guy failed" but I didn't admiss to anything and held my line.

Furthermore there were questions like "Do you intend to lie/have you lied answering to questions" which seemed(as he didn't mention them being abnormal) to produce no abnormalities(again, no clue, he just mentioned the reaction was to those two questions.

Does it mean I failed??? Or maybe he was trying to get an admission out of me to fail me for sure? How would you rate the chance of failure from 1 to 100??