Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by annawarren548
 - Jul 17, 2017, 10:06 AM
Quote from: George_Maschke on Mar 02, 2017, 12:34 AMMost people who stumble across this message board don't register. The message source board is also routinely spidered by bots that show up as guests. There are no doubt federal (and other) polygraphers who lurk on this site (and they're welcome to do so). I see no basis, however, for inferring that most guests on this board are from the intelligence community. I think it is overwhelmingly likely that the opposite is true.

Overall good point  ;)
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 02, 2017, 12:34 AM
Most people who stumble across this message board don't register. The message board is also routinely spidered by bots that show up as guests. There are no doubt federal (and other) polygraphers who lurk on this site (and they're welcome to do so). I see no basis, however, for inferring that most guests on this board are from the intelligence community. I think it is overwhelmingly likely that the opposite is true.
Posted by xenonman
 - Mar 02, 2017, 12:00 AM
Why, at virtually any given time, is the ratio of guest to member viewers on AP always so incredibly high?
Are we to assume that most of these "guests" are lurkers from  the IC?    ::)