Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Ex Member
 - Feb 25, 2016, 01:43 PM
Quoteperhaps  there is a group of people who value this not being made public?
John Juan, although you are replying to a very old post, your question is interesting. There is indeed a group who values this not being made public--the U.S. Government. They cannot stifle free speech, but they have already demonstrated their propensity to come down on someone who crosses their line of tolerance to the point where I would not even entertain the thought of teaching someone how to employ countermeasures.
Posted by john juan lucrative
 - Feb 25, 2016, 03:41 AM
how much is this  ability worth?
i know it works it did for me when i really needed it. perhaps  there is a group of people who value this not being made public?
Posted by orolan
 - May 16, 2003, 01:19 AM
You know the old saying, "The more things change, the more they stay the same".
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - May 15, 2003, 10:36 AM
William Scott Stewart's long-forgotten article, "How to Beat the Lie Detector" (Esquire magazine, November 1941) may be the earliest ever published on polygraph countermeasures. Stewart also documents waste, fraud, and abuse associated with the use of the lie detector at that time. It's amazing how little things have changed after more than sixty years!