Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by xenonman
 - Jun 23, 2015, 12:11 PM
Quote from: George_Maschke on Jun 18, 2015, 05:57 AMIt seems probable. ABC News reports that "Information from SF-86 forms dating back three decades could have been exposed in the cyber-attack..."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/opm-hack-deeper-publicly-acknowledged-undetected-year-sources/story?id=31689059
If that is in fact the case, then that would be a real silver lining in the cloud.   :)
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 18, 2015, 05:57 AM
It seems probable. ABC News reports that "Information from SF-86 forms dating back three decades could have been exposed in the cyber-attack..."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/opm-hack-deeper-publicly-acknowledged-undetected-year-sources/story?id=31689059
Posted by xenonman
 - Jun 18, 2015, 05:42 AM
Any word on whether or not personnel data on employees of the intelligence community was compromised as a result of the recent so-called "Chinese" federal employee data hacking? :o