Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by forgetthebollocks
 - Mar 20, 2015, 11:36 AM
Man, good point and I think this is what's been the controversy over it for just that. I did the poly last year in August.  I didn't pass and was accused of "illegal activity at my work place".
Posted by RasberryDonut
 - Mar 18, 2015, 01:03 PM
Years ago back in the 90's I took a polygraph to prove m innocence in a series of thefts I was involved in. I was involved and I was young and very stupid then. I didn't know the laws regarding it then, I had no attorney or anything.  I took the test and was just as shocked as the poly test giver when he informed me that I passed. I lied through my teeth. I have no idea what I did to pass it. Other than blind luck. So if a know nothing little thief can pass while lying, and they arent even admissable, then why are they even used?