Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Marty (Guest)
 - Aug 02, 2002, 02:39 AM
As just reported in the Wash Post, the FBI has interviewed a number of Senators and asked some of them to take polygraphs.  For some reason they have recieved less than complete cooperation. Among the reasons the Senators have refused includes "unreliability."  How could Senators possibly think the polygraph unreliable when they would be screened by the VERY BEST examiners the FBI has to offer. And we have all heard how a really good examiner is nearly perfect.

ROFLMAO

****From the Post****
Most of the lawmakers have told the FBI they would refuse a polygraph, citing the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government and the unreliability of the exam, those involved in the inquiry said.


-marty-