Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by xenonman
 - Nov 18, 2013, 05:11 PM
It amazes me that people with such proclivities can even consider working in the intelligence community! :)
Posted by Sohcahtoa
 - Nov 18, 2013, 10:54 AM
Your call on whether or not to apply. But the only "right" answer to any question about sex with animals is no. Admitting to the peanut butter episode wont help you pass a polygraph. It will get you DQed.

So the rational choice is simple. Either don't apply at all, or go ahead with the application and don't mention the peanut butter episode. Ever again. To anyone.
Posted by Sohcahtoa
 - Nov 18, 2013, 10:07 AM
Quote from: Sohcahtoa on Nov 18, 2013, 09:40 AMAren't they gonna asked about bestiality or sex with animals in the polygraph? 

Yes, they might.
Posted by Sohcahtoa
 - Nov 18, 2013, 09:35 AM
It won't keep you from getting hired if you don't mention it.