Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Dec 18, 2012, 02:43 AM
On 13 December 2012, McClatchy published a letter from American Polygraph Association vice-president for governmental affairs Robert Peters, who is also a retired senior CIA polygraph operator. Peters is critical of Taylor's reporting, castigating it as "incomplete" and "poorly researched."

I found Peters' critique to be so poorly argued that it was hard to decide how to even begin to respond. Nonetheless, I sent McClatchy a response to Peters' letter. It has been published and may be read here.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Dec 06, 2012, 02:31 PM
McClatchy investigative reporter Marisa Taylor has published a series of in-depth articles on the federal government's growing reliance on the pseudoscience of polygraphy, the lack of oversight of polygraph operators, the misgivings of federal polygraph examiners regarding the value of polygraphing detainees in Iraq, and the federal government's withholding of information from researchers: