Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Daniel Rustburn
 - Jul 11, 2012, 07:54 AM
That is correct, but you need to also be aware of how much too invoke the response to the relevant questions because if you consistently invoke a response at a specific question and do not have the same response at another relevant question then you have alerted the examiner that you have an issue with that particular relevant question and will fail.  The real question is are you sophisticated enough to engage in CM and if you are not, then do not try it.
Posted by stefano
 - Feb 24, 2012, 07:16 PM
Quote from: Stressed on Feb 23, 2012, 01:59 PMI'm sorry but I do not understand the statement of varying your responses to two differing groups oftwo relavent questions in two different chart presentations.
Stressed,
For the R/I format, examiners look for "consistent, specific, and significant" reactions to a particular relevant question. By randomly varying your responses, such attributes cannot be distinguished.
Posted by Stressed
 - Feb 23, 2012, 01:59 PM
I'm sorry but I do not understand the statement of varying your responses to two differing groups of  two relavent questions in two different chart presentations. ( I know that is not a direct quote).

Can someone give me an example of this....