Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by anonymous916
 - Apr 27, 2012, 08:30 PM
Lincoln PD uses CVSA.  That department is in sad shape though.
Posted by Aldrich
 - Feb 19, 2012, 01:58 PM
I Agree, there is no doubt that both are bogus.  However, what I've gleaned from these message boards and people I have personally talked to is that the cvsa is less likely to give a false positive.  It seems the only way to fail is to give condemning  admissions.  I could be wrong, but nevertheless I think this would be usefull info for the forum.
Posted by Twoblock
 - Feb 07, 2012, 09:26 PM
Aldrich

Even the maker of the CVSA admitted that it has no ability to detect the truth or lie. Why do you think it's better than the polygraph? They are both FLIM FLAM.
Posted by Aldrich
 - Feb 07, 2012, 04:45 PM
Does anybody know any police departments that use the cvsa in central and northern california?  I already know Berkeley, Roseville, most county sheriff departments and chp use them. After reading many forums I would prefer my fate decided by the magical powers of the of the cvsa rather than the polygraph. Thank you in advance for any helpful insight.