Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Navyman
 - Dec 21, 2010, 07:53 AM
I was recently commissioned as an officer in the Navy and just had my personal interview to get my clearance upped to TS. I feel the interview went ok, but at the end the investigator brought up a topic that I had legitimately forgot to include in my SF86. 7 1/2 years ago, as a freshman in college, I was caught with beer in a dorm room by some RA's and given university-administered punishment of disciplinary probation and an essay.
Now I wouldn't be too worried about this except she went deeper into my alcohol use as a teenager and today: how much did I drink? How often did I drink to intoxication? How many drinks did it take to get drunk? It worries me because she seemed to already ask these questions, and by delving into that topic again she seemed to think I was hiding something. Does this seem detrimental to me getting a TS, esp. since I forgot to mention that incident in my SF86?